StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Django vs Zope

Django vs Zope

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Django
Django
Stacks38.7K
Followers34.8K
Votes4.2K
GitHub Stars85.6K
Forks33.2K
Zope
Zope
Stacks175
Followers14
Votes1
GitHub Stars377
Forks106

Django vs Zope: What are the differences?

Introduction

The following Markdown code provides a comparison between Django and Zope, highlighting the key differences between the two frameworks.

  1. Scalability: Django is known for its scalability, making it suitable for large and complex projects. Its modular structure allows for easy integration of additional packages and components. On the other hand, Zope is designed to handle smaller projects, and its scalability may be limited when it comes to larger applications.

  2. Ease of Use: Django has a more straightforward learning curve compared to Zope. It provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface, allowing developers to quickly build web applications with less effort. Zope, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and requires a deeper understanding of its concepts and principles.

  3. Community Support: Django has a vibrant and active community that offers extensive support, regular updates, and a wide range of third-party libraries and plugins. Zope, on the other hand, has a smaller community and relatively less active development compared to Django, resulting in fewer resources and support options.

  4. Flexibility: Django follows the model-view-controller (MVC) architectural pattern, which provides a high level of flexibility in separating the different components of an application. This allows for easier maintenance and modification of different parts of the system. Zope, on the other hand, follows a different architectural pattern known as the component architecture. While it provides its own benefits, it may not offer the same level of flexibility as Django's MVC pattern.

  5. Database Support: Django provides built-in support for various databases, including popular ones like MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite. It offers an Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) layer that simplifies database operations and allows for easy switching between different database backends. Zope, on the other hand, primarily focuses on using ZODB (Zope Object Database), which is an object-oriented database management system. While it can integrate with external databases, it may require additional configurations and customizations.

  6. Integration with Content Management Systems (CMS): Django provides a wide range of options for integrating with popular CMS platforms such as Django CMS and Wagtail. These CMS solutions offer advanced content management features and easy integration with Django's framework. Zope, on the other hand, has its own content management system called Plone, which is tightly integrated with the Zope framework and provides extensive CMS capabilities.

In summary, Django offers better scalability, ease of use, community support, and flexibility compared to Zope. It also provides more options for database support and integration with popular CMS solutions. However, Zope may still be suitable for smaller projects and those specifically requiring ZODB and Plone integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Django, Zope

Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Decided

Since I came from python I had two choices: #django or #flask. It felt like it was a better idea to go for #django considering I was building a blogging platform, this is kind of what #django was made for. On the other hand, #rails seems to be a fantastic framework to get things done. Although I do not regret any of my time spent on developing with #django I want to give @{#rails}|topic:null| a try some day in the future for the sake of curiosity.

438k views438k
Comments
Sandeep
Sandeep

Jun 13, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonJavaScriptJavaScriptJinjaJinja

I have learned both Python and JavaScript. I also tried my hand at Django. But i found it difficult to work with Django, on frontend its Jinja format is very confusing and limited. I have not tried Node.js yet and unsure which tool to go ahead with. I want an internship as soon as possible so please answer keeping that in mind.

599k views599k
Comments
Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Django
Django
Zope
Zope

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

It is a family of free and open-source web application servers written in Python, and their associated online community. It stands for "Z Object Publishing Environment", and was the first system using the now common object publishing methodology for the Web

-
Easy to use; Specific; Reusable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
85.6K
GitHub Stars
377
GitHub Forks
33.2K
GitHub Forks
106
Stacks
38.7K
Stacks
175
Followers
34.8K
Followers
14
Votes
4.2K
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 678
    Rapid development
  • 488
    Open source
  • 426
    Great community
  • 380
    Easy to learn
  • 277
    Mvc
Cons
  • 26
    Underpowered templating
  • 22
    Autoreload restarts whole server
  • 22
    Underpowered ORM
  • 15
    URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
  • 10
    Internal subcomponents coupling
Pros
  • 1
    For using Plone CMS
Integrations
Python
Python
Python
Python
EasyEngine
EasyEngine
Plesk
Plesk
Scalyr
Scalyr
Datadog
Datadog
Tarantool
Tarantool
OpenResty
OpenResty

What are some alternatives to Django, Zope?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase