Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
IBM DB2 vs Memcached: What are the differences?
IBM DB2: A family of database server products developed by IBM. DB2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows is optimized to deliver industry-leading performance across multiple workloads, while lowering administration, storage, development, and server costs; Memcached: High-performance, distributed memory object caching system. Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.
IBM DB2 and Memcached can be primarily classified as "Databases" tools.
"Rock solid and very scalable" is the primary reason why developers consider IBM DB2 over the competitors, whereas "Fast object cache" was stated as the key factor in picking Memcached.
Memcached is an open source tool with 8.99K GitHub stars and 2.6K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Memcached's open source repository on GitHub.
Facebook, Instagram, and Dropbox are some of the popular companies that use Memcached, whereas IBM DB2 is used by XMLi5 Ltd., ITAIPU BINACIONAL, and Applic8. Memcached has a broader approval, being mentioned in 755 company stacks & 267 developers stacks; compared to IBM DB2, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 9 developer stacks.
Pros of IBM DB2
- Rock solid and very scalable7
- BLU Analytics is amazingly fast5
- Native XML support2
- Secure by default2
- Easy2
- Best performance1
Pros of Memcached
- Fast object cache139
- High-performance129
- Stable91
- Mature65
- Distributed caching system33
- Improved response time and throughput11
- Great for caching HTML3
- Putta2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of IBM DB2
Cons of Memcached
- Only caches simple types2