Overview

Cypress

Stacks2.4K

Followers2.0K

Votes115

GitHub Stars49.4K

Forks3.4K

Katalon Studio

Stacks153

Followers177

Votes0

Cypress vs Katalon Studio: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Cypress and Katalon Studio

Cypress and Katalon Studio are two popular test automation tools, each with its own set of features and capabilities. Here are the key differences between the two:

1. Language and Syntax: Cypress uses JavaScript as its scripting language, whereas Katalon Studio supports multiple scripting languages such as Java, Groovy, and JavaScript. This allows developers to use their preferred language for test automation.

2. Architecture and Execution: Cypress is primarily a JavaScript-based testing framework that runs directly in the browser. It executes tests in the same context as the application, enabling real-time debugging and faster feedback. On the other hand, Katalon Studio follows a client-server architecture, where tests are executed on a separate remote machine or device.

3. Test Design and User Interface: Cypress provides a simple and intuitive user interface, allowing testers to easily create and organize test cases using its built-in Test Runner. Katalon Studio, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive user interface with features such as object spy, built-in test case management, and integration with other tools like Jira.

4. Test Execution Speed: Cypress is known for its fast execution speed as it runs directly on the browser, allowing it to directly access the application's APIs and manipulate DOM elements. Katalon Studio's execution speed depends on the configuration of the remote machine or device where the tests are run.

5. Plugin Ecosystem: Cypress has a limited number of plugins available compared to Katalon Studio. However, it provides a powerful open-source API that allows developers to extend its capabilities and create custom plugins. Katalon Studio, on the other hand, offers a rich ecosystem of plugins and integrations, making it easier to incorporate various tools and frameworks into the testing process.

6. Learning Curve and Community Support: Cypress has a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its JavaScript-based nature. However, it has gained popularity among JavaScript developers and has an active community that provides support and resources. Katalon Studio has a relatively easier learning curve, especially for testers with a background in Java or scripting languages. It also has a large community and official support channels.

In summary, Cypress is a JavaScript-centric testing framework known for its real-time debugging and fast execution speed, while Katalon Studio offers a comprehensive user interface, multi-language support, and a vast plugin ecosystem. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the project and the expertise of the testing team.

Advice on Cypress, Katalon Studio

Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceon

Cypress

Jest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

835k views835k

Comments

Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceon

AngularJS

TypeScript

Cypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Cypress	Katalon Studio
Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.	Katalon Studio is a free and robust automation solution for API, Web and Mobile testing. It integrates all necessary components with built-in keywords and project templates into a complete automation framework. Katalon Studio is easy-to-use for new users but still offers advanced capabilities for experienced users. The solution is trusted by an active community of over 150K users from 150+ countries around the world.
Time Travel; Debuggability; Automatic Waiting; Spies, Stubs, and Clocks; Network Traffic Control; Consistent Results; Screenshots and Videos	Productive IDE for API automation; API testing centric; Built to work with modern frameworks; Sustainable and scalable platform; Minimal maintenance; Built-in project templates; Generate tests automatically; Powerful test execution mechanism; CI/CD readiness; Dynamic failure handling and automatic re-execution; Report and Debug; Test Maintenance
Statistics
GitHub Stars 49.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 3.4K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 2.4K	Stacks 153
Followers 2.0K	Followers 177
Votes 115	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 29 Open source 22 Great documentation 20 Simple usage 18 Fast 10 Cross Browser testing Cons 21 Cypress is weak at cross-browser testing 14 Switch tabs : Cypress can'nt support 12 No iFrame support 9 No multiple domain support 9 No page object support	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	CircleCI Jira Jenkins GitHub Slack Azure DevOps Travis CI BrowserStack TestLink Sauce Labs

What are some alternatives to Cypress, Katalon Studio?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.