CuPy vs NumPy

Overview

NumPy

Stacks4.3K

Followers799

Votes15

GitHub Stars30.7K

Forks11.7K

CuPy

Stacks8

Followers27

Votes0

GitHub Stars10.6K

Forks967

CuPy vs NumPy: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of scientific computing and data analysis, both CuPy and NumPy play crucial roles in enabling high-performance computations. CuPy is a GPU-enabled library that allows users to perform array manipulations on NVIDIA GPUs, while NumPy is a widely-used library for numerical computing on CPUs. Although they both revolve around array computation, there are notable differences between CuPy and NumPy that set them apart.

Array Computation: While NumPy runs array computations on CPUs, CuPy utilizes GPUs for highly parallelized numerical calculations. This key distinction allows CuPy to achieve accelerated performance and exploit the immense processing power of modern GPUs compared to NumPy on CPUs.
GPU Memory Management: CuPy provides automatic memory management for GPU arrays, ensuring efficient utilization of GPU memory. On the other hand, in NumPy, memory management is handled by the CPU, which may not optimize memory usage as effectively as CuPy does on GPUs.
Syntax and API Compatibility: CuPy strives to provide a syntax and API that is highly compatible with NumPy, making it easier for users to migrate their code from NumPy to CuPy or use CuPy as a drop-in replacement. However, there may still be some differences and limitations in CuPy's API compared to NumPy.
Parallelism and Portability: CuPy takes advantage of the parallel processing capabilities of GPUs, enabling faster computations on large datasets. In contrast, NumPy does not inherently provide parallelism and is limited to the processing power of CPUs. Additionally, CuPy's portable nature allows users to write code that can be executed on different platforms with compatible GPUs.
Ecosystem and Community Support: While NumPy has a well-established ecosystem and a large community of users, CuPy, being a relatively newer library, may have a smaller ecosystem and community. This can impact the availability of additional third-party libraries and support resources for CuPy compared to NumPy.
Compatibility with Existing Libraries: Since CuPy aims to be compatible with NumPy, it can seamlessly integrate with other libraries built on top of NumPy, such as SciPy and pandas. This compatibility ensures that users can leverage their existing codebase and take advantage of GPU acceleration by replacing NumPy with CuPy.

In Summary, CuPy and NumPy differ in terms of the underlying hardware utilization, memory management, syntax compatibility, parallelism, ecosystem support, and compatibility with existing libraries. While CuPy harnesses the power of GPUs for faster computations, NumPy remains widely used on CPUs, offering a more mature ecosystem and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

NumPy	CuPy
Besides its obvious scientific uses, NumPy can also be used as an efficient multi-dimensional container of generic data. Arbitrary data-types can be defined. This allows NumPy to seamlessly and speedily integrate with a wide variety of databases.	It is an open-source matrix library accelerated with NVIDIA CUDA. CuPy provides GPU accelerated computing with Python. It uses CUDA-related libraries including cuBLAS, cuDNN, cuRand, cuSolver, cuSPARSE, cuFFT and NCCL to make full use of the GPU architecture.
Powerful n-dimensional arrays; Numerical computing tools; Interoperable; Performant; Easy to use	It's interface is highly compatible with NumPy in most cases it can be used as a drop-in replacement; Supports various methods, indexing, data types, broadcasting and more; You can easily make a custom CUDA kernel if you want to make your code run faster, requiring only a small code snippet of C++; It automatically wraps and compiles it to make a CUDA binary; Compiled binaries are cached and reused in subsequent runs
Statistics
GitHub Stars 30.7K	GitHub Stars 10.6K
GitHub Forks 11.7K	GitHub Forks 967
Stacks 4.3K	Stacks 8
Followers 799	Followers 27
Votes 15	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 Great for data analysis 4 Faster than list	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Python	CUDA

What are some alternatives to NumPy, CuPy?

Pandas

Flexible and powerful data analysis / manipulation library for Python, providing labeled data structures similar to R data.frame objects, statistical functions, and much more.

PyXLL

Integrate Python into Microsoft Excel. Use Excel as your user-facing front-end with calculations, business logic and data access powered by Python. Works with all 3rd party and open source Python packages. No need to write any VBA!

CBDC Resources

CBDC Resources is a data and analytics platform that centralizes global information on Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) projects. It provides structured datasets, interactive visualizations, and technology-oriented insights used by fintech developers, analysts, and research teams. The platform aggregates official documents, technical specifications, and implementation details from institutions such as the IMF, BIS, ECB, and national central banks. Developers and product teams use CBDC Resources to integrate CBDC data into research workflows, dashboards, risk models, and fintech applications. Website : https://cbdcresources.com/

SciPy

Python-based ecosystem of open-source software for mathematics, science, and engineering. It contains modules for optimization, linear algebra, integration, interpolation, special functions, FFT, signal and image processing, ODE solvers and other tasks common in science and engineering.

Dataform

Dataform helps you manage all data processes in your cloud data warehouse. Publish tables, write data tests and automate complex SQL workflows in a few minutes, so you can spend more time on analytics and less time managing infrastructure.

PySpark

It is the collaboration of Apache Spark and Python. it is a Python API for Spark that lets you harness the simplicity of Python and the power of Apache Spark in order to tame Big Data.

Anaconda

A free and open-source distribution of the Python and R programming languages for scientific computing, that aims to simplify package management and deployment. Package versions are managed by the package management system conda.

Dask

It is a versatile tool that supports a variety of workloads. It is composed of two parts: Dynamic task scheduling optimized for computation. This is similar to Airflow, Luigi, Celery, or Make, but optimized for interactive computational workloads. Big Data collections like parallel arrays, dataframes, and lists that extend common interfaces like NumPy, Pandas, or Python iterators to larger-than-memory or distributed environments. These parallel collections run on top of dynamic task schedulers.

Pentaho Data Integration

It enable users to ingest, blend, cleanse and prepare diverse data from any source. With visual tools to eliminate coding and complexity, It puts the best quality data at the fingertips of IT and the business.

StreamSets

An end-to-end data integration platform to build, run, monitor and manage smart data pipelines that deliver continuous data for DataOps.

Related Comparisons

CuPy vs NumPy: What are the differences?

Introduction

Array Computation: While NumPy runs array computations on CPUs, CuPy utilizes GPUs for highly parallelized numerical calculations. This key distinction allows CuPy to achieve accelerated performance and exploit the immense processing power of modern GPUs compared to NumPy on CPUs.
GPU Memory Management: CuPy provides automatic memory management for GPU arrays, ensuring efficient utilization of GPU memory. On the other hand, in NumPy, memory management is handled by the CPU, which may not optimize memory usage as effectively as CuPy does on GPUs.
Syntax and API Compatibility: CuPy strives to provide a syntax and API that is highly compatible with NumPy, making it easier for users to migrate their code from NumPy to CuPy or use CuPy as a drop-in replacement. However, there may still be some differences and limitations in CuPy's API compared to NumPy.
Parallelism and Portability: CuPy takes advantage of the parallel processing capabilities of GPUs, enabling faster computations on large datasets. In contrast, NumPy does not inherently provide parallelism and is limited to the processing power of CPUs. Additionally, CuPy's portable nature allows users to write code that can be executed on different platforms with compatible GPUs.
Ecosystem and Community Support: While NumPy has a well-established ecosystem and a large community of users, CuPy, being a relatively newer library, may have a smaller ecosystem and community. This can impact the availability of additional third-party libraries and support resources for CuPy compared to NumPy.
Compatibility with Existing Libraries: Since CuPy aims to be compatible with NumPy, it can seamlessly integrate with other libraries built on top of NumPy, such as SciPy and pandas. This compatibility ensures that users can leverage their existing codebase and take advantage of GPU acceleration by replacing NumPy with CuPy.

CuPy vs NumPy

Overview