CreateJS vs GreenSock: What are the differences?

# Introduction
When it comes to web animation libraries, CreateJS and GreenSock are two popular choices that developers often consider. Both libraries have their own unique features and capabilities that set them apart. 

1. **Syntax and API Design**: CreateJS follows a more traditional object-oriented approach with its syntax and API design, making it easier for beginners to understand and work with. On the other hand, GreenSock offers a more concise and intuitive syntax, which is favored by more experienced developers for its flexibility and power.

2. **Performance**: GreenSock is renowned for its superior performance, being optimized for speed and efficiency in animating complex sequences and effects. CreateJS, while still capable, may not offer the same level of optimization and performance as GreenSock.

3. **Community and Support**: GreenSock has a larger and more active community of users, providing greater access to support, resources, and plugins. CreateJS, while also supported by a dedicated community, may not have the same level of resources available.

4. **Compatibility and Browser Support**: CreateJS is designed to work well with HTML5 canvas and SVG elements, making it a suitable choice for projects that heavily utilize these technologies. GreenSock, on the other hand, is versatile and compatible with a wide range of web technologies, ensuring broader browser support and compatibility.

5. **Feature Set**: GreenSock is known for its extensive feature set, offering a wide range of animations, effects, and transitions that can be easily implemented. CreateJS, while versatile, may have a more limited set of features and effects compared to GreenSock.

6. **Cost**: While both libraries offer free versions, GreenSock's premium features and plugins may come at a cost. CreateJS, on the other hand, is primarily open-source and free to use for a wide range of projects.

In Summary, CreateJS and GreenSock offer distinct differences in syntax, performance, community support, compatibility, feature set, and cost, making them suitable for different types of projects and developer preferences.