StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. C++ vs Martini

C++ vs Martini

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Martini
Martini
Stacks16
Followers37
Votes15
GitHub Stars11.6K
Forks1.1K
C++
C++
Stacks18.2K
Followers9.4K
Votes866

C++ vs Martini: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between C++ and Martini

C++ is a general-purpose programming language created as an extension of the C programming language, while Martini is a specific domain-specific language tailored for building analytical models and simulation libraries. 
1. **Syntax**: C++ follows a syntax similar to C, with a more intricate and complex structure, while Martini has a simplified syntax specifically designed for modeling and simulation purposes.
2. **Memory Management**: In C++, memory management is manual, requiring the programmer to handle memory allocation and deallocation, whereas Martini abstracts memory management, making it easier for users to focus on model development.
3. **Usage**: C++ is widely used in a variety of applications, from system programming to game development, while Martini is primarily used in academic and research settings for analytical modeling and simulation tasks.
4. **Compilers**: C++ is supported by a wide range of compilers such as GCC, Clang, and Visual C++, while Martini has a specific compiler dedicated to translating its specialized syntax into executable models.
5. **Libraries**: C++ has a vast standard library and supports third-party libraries for diverse applications, whereas Martini has a focused library ecosystem tailored to numerical computation and simulation modeling.
6. **Performance**: C++ is known for its high performance and low-level control over hardware, making it suitable for resource-intensive applications, while Martini prioritizes ease of development over raw performance to facilitate rapid prototyping and model iteration.

In Summary, C++ and Martini differ in syntax complexity, memory management, usage scenarios, compiler support, library ecosystem, and performance characteristics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Martini, C++

albert
albert

May 5, 2020

Needs advice

I am currently learning Back-End design, and I am confused with the term Back-End API. My question is do I need to have a webserver? That is the Browser send a http request to the Webserver, based on the URL, the Webserver will execute the WEB API and route the request to it and send back the response received from the WEB API to the browser. If so, what are the differences from the WebServer to execute a CGI in the traditional architecture?

If this is not the case, is the WEB API a standalone server/application that can process the HTTP request and send back the response to the browser? Thank you very much for clarifying...

63.7k views63.7k
Comments
Russtopia
Russtopia

Sr. Doodad Imagineer at Russtopia Labs

Dec 8, 2019

Decided

As a personal research project I wanted to add post-quantum crypto KEM (key encapsulation) algorithms and new symmetric crypto session algorithms to openssh. I found the openssh code and its channel/context management extremely complex.

Concurrently, I was learning Go. It occurred to me that Go's excellent standard library, including crypto libraries, plus its much safer memory model and string/buffer handling would be better suited to a secure remote shell solution. So I started from scratch, writing a clean-room Go-based solution, without regard for ssh compatibility. Interactive and token-based login, secure copy and tunnels.

Of course, it needs a proper security audit for side channel attacks, protocol vulnerabilities and so on -- but I was impressed by how much simpler a client-server application with crypto and complex terminal handling was in Go.

<pre> $ sloc openssh-portable Languages Files Code Comment Blank Total CodeLns Total 502 112982 14327 15705 143014 100.0% C 389 105938 13349 14416 133703 93.5% Shell 92 6118 937 1129 8184 5.7% Make 16 468 37 131 636 0.4% AWK 1 363 0 7 370 0.3% C++ 3 79 4 18 101 0.1% Conf 1 16 0 4 20 0.0% $ sloc xs Languages Files Code Comment Blank Total CodeLns Total 34 3658 1231 655 5544 100.0% Go 19 3230 1199 507 4936 89.0% Markdown 2 181 0 76 257 4.6% Make 7 148 4 50 202 3.6% YAML 1 39 0 5 44 0.8% Text 1 30 0 7 37 0.7% Modula 1 16 0 2 18 0.3% Shell 3 14 28 8 50 0.9% </pre>

https://gogs.blitter.com/RLabs/xs

233k views233k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Martini
Martini
C++
C++

Martini is a powerful package for quickly writing modular web applications/services in Golang.

C++ compiles directly to a machine's native code, allowing it to be one of the fastest languages in the world, if optimized.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
16
Stacks
18.2K
Followers
37
Followers
9.4K
Votes
15
Votes
866
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Go
  • 4
    Simple
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Flexible Routing
  • 1
    Express/Sinatra style framework
Pros
  • 206
    Performance
  • 108
    Control over memory allocation
  • 99
    Cross-platform
  • 98
    Fast
  • 85
    Object oriented
Cons
  • 8
    Slow compilation
  • 8
    Unsafe
  • 6
    Fragile ABI
  • 6
    Over-complicated
  • 5
    No standard/mainstream dependency management
Integrations
Golang
Golang
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Martini, C++?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase