StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Couchbase vs Crux (open source)

Couchbase vs Crux (open source)

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Couchbase
Couchbase
Stacks505
Followers606
Votes110
Crux
Crux
Stacks7
Followers21
Votes4

Couchbase vs Crux (open source): What are the differences?

Introduction

Couchbase and Crux are two popular open-source databases that offer unique features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between the two can help you make an informed decision based on your specific needs.

  1. Data Model: One significant difference between Couchbase and Crux is their data models. Couchbase uses a document-oriented data model, where data is stored in JSON format, providing flexibility and ease of use. On the other hand, Crux adopts an entity-attribute-value (EAV) data model, allowing for more dynamic and complex data structures with distributed transaction processing capabilities.

  2. Query Language: Couchbase utilizes N1QL (SQL for JSON) as its query language, enabling users to perform SQL-like queries on JSON data. In contrast, Crux offers a unique query language called Datalog, which leverages logic programming principles for querying and analyzing data, providing advanced pattern matching and expressive querying capabilities.

  3. Consistency Model: When it comes to consistency, Couchbase provides strong consistency through multi-document ACID transactions, ensuring data integrity and concurrency control. Meanwhile, Crux focuses on eventual consistency, allowing for high availability and fault tolerance in distributed environments by prioritizing availability over consistency during network partitions.

  4. Indexing Mechanism: Couchbase relies on Global Secondary Indexes (GSI) for indexing data and accelerating query performance, offering flexibility but requiring additional maintenance for index management. In contrast, Crux employs a unique indexing mechanism called Inverted List Indexes, which are designed for immutable data and provide efficient indexing and querying while minimizing overhead in a time-traveling database.

  5. Scalability Approach: In terms of scalability, Couchbase follows a linearly scalable architecture, allowing users to horizontally scale their clusters by adding nodes to meet growing demands. On the other hand, Crux emphasizes horizontal scalability through its sharding capabilities, enabling the distribution of data and workload across multiple nodes for improved performance and resource utilization.

  6. Data Processing Features: While Couchbase focuses on real-time data processing and analytics with support for ad-hoc queries and aggregations, Crux excels in temporal queries and historical data analysis through its efficient time-travel and query execution capabilities, making it well-suited for event sourcing and auditing use cases.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Couchbase and Crux in terms of data model, query language, consistency model, indexing mechanism, scalability approach, and data processing features can help organizations choose the right database solution based on their specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Couchbase, Crux

Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at Naologic

Jan 2, 2020

DecidedonCouchDBCouchDBCouchbaseCouchbaseMemcachedMemcached

We implemented our first large scale EPR application from naologic.com using CouchDB .

Very fast, replication works great, doesn't consume much RAM, queries are blazing fast but we found a problem: the queries were very hard to write, it took a long time to figure out the API, we had to go and write our own @nodejs library to make it work properly.

It lost most of its support. Since then, we migrated to Couchbase and the learning curve was steep but all worth it. Memcached indexing out of the box, full text search works great.

592k views592k
Comments
Mike
Mike

Mar 20, 2020

Needs advice

We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Couchbase
Couchbase
Crux
Crux

Developed as an alternative to traditionally inflexible SQL databases, the Couchbase NoSQL database is built on an open source foundation and architected to help developers solve real-world problems and meet high scalability demands.

An open source document database with bitemporal graph queries. Follows an unbundled architectural approach, which means that it is assembled from highly decoupled components through the use of semi-immutable logs at the core of its design.

JSON document database; N1QL (SQL-like query language); Secondary Indexing; Full-Text Indexing; Eventing/Triggers; Real-Time Analytics; Mobile Synchronization for offline support; Autonomous Operator for Kubernetes and OpenShift
Bitemporal modeling; Schemaless; Unbundled; Apache Kafka for primary storage; Rich query support; Distributed; Enterprise support
Statistics
Stacks
505
Stacks
7
Followers
606
Followers
21
Votes
110
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 18
    High performance
  • 18
    Flexible data model, easy scalability, extremely fast
  • 9
    Mobile app support
  • 7
    You can query it with Ansi-92 SQL
  • 6
    All nodes can be read/write
Cons
  • 3
    Terrible query language
Pros
  • 1
    Document oriented
  • 1
    Open & Extensible
  • 1
    Native bitemporality
  • 1
    Graph queries
Integrations
Hadoop
Hadoop
Kafka
Kafka
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Kafka
Kafka
Java
Java
Clojure
Clojure
RocksDB
RocksDB

What are some alternatives to Couchbase, Crux?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase