StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Cotter vs Stormpath

Cotter vs Stormpath

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Stormpath
Stormpath
Stacks40
Followers96
Votes146
Cotter
Cotter
Stacks1
Followers7
Votes0

Cotter vs Stormpath: What are the differences?

# Cotter vs. Stormpath

## 1. User Registration and Authentication: 
Cotter offers a comprehensive User Registration and Authentication service, ensuring secure user management and login functionalities. On the other hand, Stormpath lacks some advanced user registration features and may require additional configurations for certain authentication methods.

## 2. Scalability and Reliability:
Cotter provides scalable and reliable services, making it suitable for growing applications with increasing user bases. Stormpath, on the other hand, has limitations in terms of scalability and may not be the best choice for applications expecting rapid growth.

## 3. Integration Capabilities:
Cotter offers seamless integration with various platforms and frameworks, making it easy to incorporate into existing systems. In contrast, Stormpath may have limited integration capabilities, requiring more effort for integration with certain technologies.

## 4. Customization Options:
Cotter provides extensive customization options, allowing developers to tailor the user management experience to their specific requirements. Stormpath, on the other hand, may have limitations in customization, restricting developers in implementing unique functionalities.

## 5. Maintenance and Support:
Cotter offers regular maintenance updates and reliable customer support, ensuring a smooth user management experience. Stormpath may have limited support options and slower response times, leading to potential delays in issue resolution.

## 6. Pricing and Cost:
While both Cotter and Stormpath offer competitive pricing plans, Cotter may provide more cost-effective solutions for small to medium-sized businesses, considering factors like scalability, features, and support options.

In Summary, Cotter stands out for its advanced user registration features, scalability, integration capabilities, customization options, maintenance support, and cost-effective pricing, making it a preferred choice for many developers and businesses.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Stormpath
Stormpath
Cotter
Cotter

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

It is an authentication SDK that lets users log in using only their Phone Numbers without a password. Integrate secure phone number login to your web/apps. It’s universal, works across apps, and doesn't require users to have a Cotter account.

User Authentication as a Service; Authorization – Easily model and manage your data, including pre-built roles; Flexible User Profiles; Single Sign-On Across your Apps; Easy Partitioning for Multi-Tenant SaaS; Pre-built Security Workflows - Password Reset, Email Verification; Hosted Login Portal; Social Login; API Authentication & Key Management; Token-based Authentication; Multi-Factor Authentication; Active Directory & LDAP Integrations; Advanced Password Security; Admin Console; Safe Harbor Compliance; HIPAA Compliance; Private Deployments;
Skip passwords for a seamless experience; Skip Email and Phone Number Verification; Built by Developers, for Developers
Statistics
Stacks
40
Stacks
1
Followers
96
Followers
7
Votes
146
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 29
    Authentication
  • 22
    User Management
  • 19
    API Authentication
  • 17
    Token Authentication
  • 17
    Security Workflows
Cons
  • 4
    Discontinued
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
G Suite
G Suite
Spring Framework
Spring Framework
Facebook
Facebook
Spring
Spring
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
AngularJS
AngularJS
JavaScript
JavaScript
Django
Django
JavaScript
JavaScript
React Native
React Native

What are some alternatives to Stormpath, Cotter?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope