Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Consul

1.1K
1.5K
+ 1
212
Hystrix

169
161
+ 1
2
Add tool

Consul vs Hystrix: What are the differences?

Introduction

Consul and Hystrix are both popular tools used in software development. While Consul is a distributed service mesh tool that provides service discovery, configuration, and segmentation, Hystrix is a latency and fault tolerance library designed to improve the resilience of complex distributed systems.

  1. Consul: Consul is primarily used for service discovery, allowing services to register themselves and discover other available services in a distributed system. It provides a DNS interface, HTTP interface, and an API for service discovery.

  2. Hystrix: Hystrix, on the other hand, focuses on latency and fault tolerance. It helps in preventing failures and improving system resilience by implementing the "Circuit Breaker" pattern, which stops requests to a service if it fails too often, and instead returns a fallback response.

  3. Consul: Consul supports multi-datacenter environments, allowing services in different data centers to communicate and discover each other. It provides built-in support for cross-datacenter WAN federation, making it suitable for large distributed systems.

  4. Hystrix: Hystrix provides real-time monitoring and metrics of the performance and health of services. It collects and aggregates metrics such as latency, throughput, and error rates, allowing developers and operators to monitor the system and identify bottlenecks or issues.

  5. Consul: Consul provides a key-value store that can be used for dynamic configuration management. Services can read or write key-value pairs, making it easy to update configurations without requiring a service restart.

  6. Hystrix: Hystrix allows for a fallback mechanism, where a default response can be returned if a service call fails or takes too long to respond. This helps in handling degraded performance or temporary unavailability of services.

In summary, Consul focuses on service discovery, configuration, and segmentation, while Hystrix is geared towards improving the resilience of distributed systems by implementing the Circuit Breaker pattern and providing real-time monitoring and fallback mechanisms.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Consul
Pros of Hystrix
  • 61
    Great service discovery infrastructure
  • 35
    Health checking
  • 29
    Distributed key-value store
  • 26
    Monitoring
  • 23
    High-availability
  • 12
    Web-UI
  • 10
    Token-based acls
  • 6
    Gossip clustering
  • 5
    Dns server
  • 4
    Not Java
  • 1
    Docker integration
  • 2
    Cirkit breaker

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is Consul?

Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.

What is Hystrix?

Hystrix is a latency and fault tolerance library designed to isolate points of access to remote systems, services and 3rd party libraries, stop cascading failure and enable resilience in complex distributed systems where failure is inevitable.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Consul?
What companies use Hystrix?
See which teams inside your own company are using Consul or Hystrix.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Consul?
What tools integrate with Hystrix?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Consul and Hystrix?
etcd
etcd is a distributed key value store that provides a reliable way to store data across a cluster of machines. It’s open-source and available on GitHub. etcd gracefully handles master elections during network partitions and will tolerate machine failure, including the master.
Zookeeper
A centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. All of these kinds of services are used in some form or another by distributed applications.
SkyDNS
SkyDNS is a distributed service for announcement and discovery of services. It leverages Raft for high-availability and consensus, and utilizes DNS queries to discover available services. This is done by leveraging SRV records in DNS, with special meaning given to subdomains, priorities and weights (more info here: http://blog.gopheracademy.com/skydns).
Ambassador
Map services to arbitrary URLs in a single, declarative YAML file. Configure routes with CORS support, circuit breakers, timeouts, and more. Replace your Kubernetes ingress controller. Route gRPC, WebSockets, or HTTP.
Kubernetes
Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
See all alternatives