Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Composer vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?
Introduction: Composer and Kubernetes are both popular tools used in the world of software development and deployment. While they serve similar purposes in managing and orchestrating applications, there are key differences between the two.
Architecture: Composer is a dependency management tool for PHP that allows developers to manage and install third-party libraries and packages in their projects. It works at the application level and is primarily used during the development phase. On the other hand, Kubernetes is a container orchestration platform that manages and scales containerized applications across a cluster of servers. It focuses on managing the deployment and runtime of applications in production environments.
Level of Abstraction: Composer operates at a higher level of abstraction as it deals with the dependencies and libraries required by an application, ensuring that the correct versions are installed and compatible with each other. Kubernetes, on the other hand, works at a lower level of abstraction by managing containers and their resources, providing functionalities like load balancing, scaling, and automatic failure recovery.
Scope of Management: Composer primarily focuses on managing applications and their dependencies within a single development environment. It resolves and installs dependencies based on the project configuration file. In contrast, Kubernetes is designed for managing complex containerized applications across multiple environments, including test and production environments. It supports the deployment and management of multiple services and containers that collectively form an application.
Scaling and Load Balancing: Kubernetes provides built-in support for scaling applications horizontally and vertically by adjusting the number of replicas and resources assigned to each container. It also offers built-in load balancing capabilities to distribute traffic across multiple instances of an application. Composer, on the other hand, does not provide native scaling or load balancing features as it is primarily used for local development and dependency management.
Monitoring and Logging: Kubernetes offers extensive monitoring and logging capabilities through integration with various tools and technologies like Prometheus and Elasticsearch. It provides metrics and logs for monitoring and troubleshooting applications running in the cluster. Composer, being a dependency management tool, does not have built-in monitoring and logging features as it focuses on managing code dependencies rather than application runtime.
Deployment Flexibility: Kubernetes supports a wide range of deployment strategies, including rolling updates, blue-green deployments, and canary releases. It allows for seamless deployment of new versions and updates without interrupting the running application. Composer, being a development tool, does not provide deployment strategies as it is primarily concerned with resolving dependencies and managing libraries.
In summary, Composer is a PHP dependency management tool used during development, while Kubernetes is a container orchestration platform that manages and scales containerized applications in production environments. Composer operates at a higher abstraction level, focusing on resolving and managing dependencies, while Kubernetes operates at a lower level, managing containers and their resources. Kubernetes offers features like scaling, load balancing, monitoring, and deployment flexibility, which are not provided by Composer.
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Pros of Composer
- Must have dependency manager for PHP7
- Centralized autoload.php3
- Large number of libraries3
Pros of Kubernetes
- Leading docker container management solution166
- Simple and powerful129
- Open source107
- Backed by google76
- The right abstractions58
- Scale services25
- Replication controller20
- Permission managment11
- Supports autoscaling9
- Simple8
- Cheap8
- Self-healing6
- Open, powerful, stable5
- Reliable5
- No cloud platform lock-in5
- Promotes modern/good infrascture practice5
- Scalable4
- Quick cloud setup4
- Custom and extensibility3
- Captain of Container Ship3
- Cloud Agnostic3
- Backed by Red Hat3
- Runs on azure3
- A self healing environment with rich metadata3
- Everything of CaaS2
- Gke2
- Golang2
- Easy setup2
- Expandable2
- Sfg2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Composer
Cons of Kubernetes
- Steep learning curve16
- Poor workflow for development15
- Orchestrates only infrastructure8
- High resource requirements for on-prem clusters4
- Too heavy for simple systems2
- Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)1
- More moving parts to secure1
- Additional Technology Overhead1