StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. CodeIgniter vs GraPHP vs Node.js

CodeIgniter vs GraPHP vs Node.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Node.js
Node.js
Stacks200.4K
Followers164.5K
Votes8.5K
GitHub Stars114.1K
Forks33.7K
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
Stacks3.2K
Followers1.5K
Votes466
GraPHP
GraPHP
Stacks0
Followers6
Votes0

CodeIgniter vs GraPHP vs Node.js: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: CodeIgniter is based on Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, providing a clear separation of logic and presentation. GraPHP, on the other hand, is a lightweight PHP framework that focuses on simplicity and speed. Node.js, being a runtime environment that uses JavaScript, primarily follows an event-driven architecture.
  2. Language Support: CodeIgniter is written in PHP, making it suitable for projects that require PHP compatibility. GraPHP is also PHP-based, offering a similar language support to CodeIgniter. Node.js, on the other hand, allows developers to use JavaScript for both server-side and client-side development.
  3. Scalability: CodeIgniter provides excellent scalability for small to medium-sized applications, offering a manageable learning curve for developers. GraPHP, being lightweight, is well-suited for fast development of smaller projects but might lack scalability for larger applications. Node.js is highly scalable due to its non-blocking I/O model, making it ideal for real-time applications and microservices.
  4. Community Support: CodeIgniter has a strong community of developers and extensive documentation, providing ample resources for troubleshooting and learning. While GraPHP has a smaller community compared to CodeIgniter, it still offers support and resources for developers. Node.js, backed by a large and active community, has a vast selection of modules and packages available through npm, enhancing its development ecosystem.
  5. Performance: CodeIgniter offers good performance for PHP-based applications, with efficient execution of code due to its lightweight nature. GraPHP emphasizes speed and simplicity, often outperforming larger frameworks in specific use cases. Node.js excels in performance, especially for handling multiple concurrent connections through its event-driven architecture and non-blocking I/O operations.
  6. Concurrency: CodeIgniter and GraPHP are more suitable for traditional web applications with synchronous processing, lacking the native support for handling concurrent connections efficiently. In contrast, Node.js is well-equipped to handle high levels of concurrency, making it an ideal choice for applications requiring real-time communication and responsiveness.

In Summary, the key differences between CodeIgniter, GraPHP, and Node.js lie in their architecture, language support, scalability, community support, performance, and concurrency handling capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Node.js, CodeIgniter, GraPHP

Shivam
Shivam

AVP - Business at VAYUZ Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Mar 25, 2020

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsJavaJavaRailsRails

Hi Community! Trust everyone is keeping safe. I am exploring the idea of building a #Neobank (App) with end-to-end banking capabilities. In the process of exploring this space, I have come across multiple Apps (N26, Revolut, Monese, etc) and explored their stacks in detail. The confusion remains to be the Backend Tech to be used?

What would you go with considering all of the languages such as Node.js Java Rails Python are suggested by some person or the other. As a general trend, I have noticed the usage of Node with React on the front or Node with a combination of Kotlin and Swift. Please suggest what would be the right approach!

915k views915k
Comments
abderrahmane
abderrahmane

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

I am a front-end guy and in the last month I've been trynig to be learn backend in python. I think python is a great language to but when i start to learn django I didn't like it because everythong is already done for you, you dont need to do much make it works and I like coding thing that take me time. I've been thinking about switching to another programing language or just learn Node js and stick with it. I need to know if django is that easy.

136k views136k
Comments
Mohammad
Mohammad

Oct 28, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsLaravelLaravelPHPPHP

I want to create a video sharing service like Youtube, which users can use to upload and watch videos. I prefer to use Vue.js for front-end. What do you suggest for the back-end? @{Node.js}|tool:1011| or @{Laravel}|tool:992| ( @{PHP}|tool:991| ) I need a good performance with high speed, and the most important thing is the ability to handle user's requests if the site's traffic increases. I want to create an algorithm that users who watch others videos earn points (randomly but in clear context) If you have anything else to improve, please let me know. For eg: If you prefer React to Vue.js. Thanks in advance

309k views309k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Node.js
Node.js
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
GraPHP
GraPHP

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

CodeIgniter is a proven, agile & open PHP web application framework with a small footprint. It is powering the next generation of web apps.

The goal of this project is to build a lightweight web framework with a graph DB abstraction. It should be very easy to create the graph schema with no knowledge of of how the data is stored. Also, the schema should be incredibly flexible so you should never need migrations when adding new models (nodes), connections (edges), or data that lives in nodes.

--
Full MVC. Zero boilerplate controllers, models, and views.;Models are your schema. Defining data is up to you (but not required).;No migrations. Team members can add new models independently without conflicts;No DB queries, unless you want to. Transparent model makes it easy to see what happens under the hood.;DB API is designed for fast performance. No implicit joins or other magic, but expressive enough for nice readable code.;No CLI needed (but supported for cron and tests).;All classes are loaded on demand when used for the first time.;PHP 5.5+
Statistics
GitHub Stars
114.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
33.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
200.4K
Stacks
3.2K
Stacks
0
Followers
164.5K
Followers
1.5K
Followers
6
Votes
8.5K
Votes
466
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1439
    Npm
  • 1279
    Javascript
  • 1129
    Great libraries
  • 1012
    High-performance
  • 805
    Open source
Cons
  • 46
    Bound to a single CPU
  • 45
    New framework every day
  • 40
    Lots of terrible examples on the internet
  • 33
    Asynchronous programming is the worst
  • 24
    Callback
Pros
  • 88
    Mvc
  • 76
    Easy setup
  • 70
    Open source
  • 62
    Well documented
  • 36
    Community support
Cons
  • 6
    No ORM
  • 1
    No CLI
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
PHP
PHP
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Node.js, CodeIgniter, GraPHP?

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase