CodeHub vs TortoiseSVN

Overview

TortoiseSVN

Stacks54

Followers117

Votes3

GitHub Stars43

Forks30

CodeHub

Stacks12

Followers15

Votes0

CodeHub vs TortoiseSVN: What are the differences?

Hosting: CodeHub is a web-based platform that hosts repositories in the cloud, making it easy for users to collaborate and access code from anywhere with an internet connection. On the other hand, TortoiseSVN requires users to set up a server to host their repositories, offering more control over the server environment but requiring additional setup.
User Interface: CodeHub offers a modern and intuitive web interface for managing repositories, making it easy for users to navigate and perform version control tasks. In contrast, TortoiseSVN integrates directly into the Windows Explorer interface, allowing users to interact with repositories using familiar file management techniques.
Version Control System: CodeHub is built around Git, a distributed version control system known for its speed and flexibility in managing code changes. TortoiseSVN, on the other hand, is built on Subversion, a centralized version control system that provides a more structured approach to managing code versions.
Platform Compatibility: CodeHub is accessible through a web browser on any platform, including Windows, Mac, and Linux, offering cross-platform compatibility for users. In contrast, TortoiseSVN is specifically designed for Windows operating systems, limiting its compatibility to Windows users only.
Collaboration features: CodeHub provides collaboration features such as issue tracking, pull requests, and code reviews, enabling teams to work together effectively on code projects. TortoiseSVN focuses primarily on version control tasks and lacks built-in collaboration features, requiring users to use external tools for collaboration.
Community Support: CodeHub, being a web-based platform, has a large community of users and developers who contribute to its development, provide support, and share resources. TortoiseSVN has a smaller community compared to CodeHub, with limited resources and support available for users.

In Summary, CodeHub and TortoiseSVN differ in hosting infrastructure, user interface, version control system, platform compatibility, collaboration features, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

TortoiseSVN	CodeHub
It is an Apache™ Subversion (SVN)® client, implemented as a Windows shell extension. It's intuitive and easy to use, since it doesn't require the Subversion command line client to run. And it is free to use, even in a commercial environment.	It is the best way to browse and maintain your GitHub repositories on any iOS device.
Easy to use. all commands are available directly from the Windows Explorer;Powerful commit dialog. integrated spell checker for log messages;Per project settings;Integration with issue tracking systems; Helpful Tools;Available in many languages	Issues & Pulls Made Easy; Notifications & Events Be Aware; Repos & Code As GitHub Intended
Statistics
GitHub Stars 43	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 30	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 54	Stacks 12
Followers 117	Followers 15
Votes 3	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Easy to use	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Windows Visual Studio Code	Atom Slack Postman

What are some alternatives to TortoiseSVN, CodeHub?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

CodeHub vs TortoiseSVN: What are the differences?

Hosting: CodeHub is a web-based platform that hosts repositories in the cloud, making it easy for users to collaborate and access code from anywhere with an internet connection. On the other hand, TortoiseSVN requires users to set up a server to host their repositories, offering more control over the server environment but requiring additional setup.
User Interface: CodeHub offers a modern and intuitive web interface for managing repositories, making it easy for users to navigate and perform version control tasks. In contrast, TortoiseSVN integrates directly into the Windows Explorer interface, allowing users to interact with repositories using familiar file management techniques.
Version Control System: CodeHub is built around Git, a distributed version control system known for its speed and flexibility in managing code changes. TortoiseSVN, on the other hand, is built on Subversion, a centralized version control system that provides a more structured approach to managing code versions.
Platform Compatibility: CodeHub is accessible through a web browser on any platform, including Windows, Mac, and Linux, offering cross-platform compatibility for users. In contrast, TortoiseSVN is specifically designed for Windows operating systems, limiting its compatibility to Windows users only.
Collaboration features: CodeHub provides collaboration features such as issue tracking, pull requests, and code reviews, enabling teams to work together effectively on code projects. TortoiseSVN focuses primarily on version control tasks and lacks built-in collaboration features, requiring users to use external tools for collaboration.
Community Support: CodeHub, being a web-based platform, has a large community of users and developers who contribute to its development, provide support, and share resources. TortoiseSVN has a smaller community compared to CodeHub, with limited resources and support available for users.

In Summary, CodeHub and TortoiseSVN differ in hosting infrastructure, user interface, version control system, platform compatibility, collaboration features, and community support.

CodeHub vs TortoiseSVN

Overview