Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Codeception vs Selenium: What are the differences?
Codeception vs Selenium
Codeception and Selenium are both popular automation testing tools used for web applications. While they both serve the same purpose, there are key differences that set them apart.
Programming Language Support: Codeception supports multiple programming languages such as PHP, Python, and Ruby, allowing developers to use their preferred language for test automation. On the other hand, Selenium primarily supports Java, although it does have limited support for other languages through third-party extensions.
Test Execution Speed: Codeception generally executes tests faster compared to Selenium. This is because Codeception utilizes the WebDriver protocol which offers faster and more efficient interactions between the tests and the browser. Selenium, on the other hand, has a relatively slower test execution speed due to its architecture and dependencies.
Built-in Test Framework: Codeception comes with a built-in test framework that provides various testing utilities and features out of the box. Selenium, on the other hand, is more of a standalone tool and requires the use of additional frameworks like TestNG or JUnit for organizing and executing tests effectively.
Browser Support: Codeception supports a wide range of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer, by leveraging Selenium WebDriver. Selenium itself supports all major browsers but requires the additional setup of browser-specific drivers to interact with them.
Ease of Use: Codeception has a simplified and intuitive syntax, making it easier for beginners to get started with test automation. It provides high-level methods and clear test scenarios, allowing for easier test creation and maintenance. Selenium, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve, especially for those new to Java or object-oriented programming.
Parallel Execution: Codeception provides easy parallel test execution, allowing multiple tests to be run concurrently. This feature enables faster test execution and improved efficiency when running tests in parallel. Selenium, on the other hand, requires additional setup and configuration to achieve parallel test execution.
In Summary, Codeception provides support for multiple programming languages, offers faster test execution speed, has a built-in test framework, supports a wide range of browsers, has an easier learning curve, and provides parallel test execution out of the box, setting it apart from Selenium.
we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................
with the help of selenium we can automate react js for functional testing
Pros of Codeception
- Easy to get up and running some simple tests4
Pros of Selenium
- Automates browsers177
- Testing154
- Essential tool for running test automation101
- Record-Playback24
- Remote Control24
- Data crawling8
- Supports end to end testing7
- Easy set up6
- Functional testing6
- The Most flexible monitoring system4
- End to End Testing3
- Easy to integrate with build tools3
- Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm2
- Record and playback2
- Compatible with Python2
- Easy to scale2
- Integration Tests2
- Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Codeception
Cons of Selenium
- Flaky tests8
- Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)4
- Update browser drivers2