Codeception vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Codeception vs Selenium

Codeception and Selenium are both popular automation testing tools used for web applications. While they both serve the same purpose, there are key differences that set them apart.

Programming Language Support: Codeception supports multiple programming languages such as PHP, Python, and Ruby, allowing developers to use their preferred language for test automation. On the other hand, Selenium primarily supports Java, although it does have limited support for other languages through third-party extensions.
Test Execution Speed: Codeception generally executes tests faster compared to Selenium. This is because Codeception utilizes the WebDriver protocol which offers faster and more efficient interactions between the tests and the browser. Selenium, on the other hand, has a relatively slower test execution speed due to its architecture and dependencies.
Built-in Test Framework: Codeception comes with a built-in test framework that provides various testing utilities and features out of the box. Selenium, on the other hand, is more of a standalone tool and requires the use of additional frameworks like TestNG or JUnit for organizing and executing tests effectively.
Browser Support: Codeception supports a wide range of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer, by leveraging Selenium WebDriver. Selenium itself supports all major browsers but requires the additional setup of browser-specific drivers to interact with them.
Ease of Use: Codeception has a simplified and intuitive syntax, making it easier for beginners to get started with test automation. It provides high-level methods and clear test scenarios, allowing for easier test creation and maintenance. Selenium, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve, especially for those new to Java or object-oriented programming.
Parallel Execution: Codeception provides easy parallel test execution, allowing multiple tests to be run concurrently. This feature enables faster test execution and improved efficiency when running tests in parallel. Selenium, on the other hand, requires additional setup and configuration to achieve parallel test execution.

In Summary, Codeception provides support for multiple programming languages, offers faster test execution speed, has a built-in test framework, supports a wide range of browsers, has an easier learning curve, and provides parallel test execution out of the box, setting it apart from Selenium.

Selenium	Codeception
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.	Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 33.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 8.6K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 15.9K	Stacks 145
Followers 12.6K	Followers 110
Votes 527	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 177 Automates browsers 154 Testing 101 Essential tool for running test automation 24 Record-Playback 24 Remote Control Cons 8 Flaky tests 4 Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui) 2 Update browser drivers	Pros 4 Easy to get up and running some simple tests

Codeception vs Selenium

Overview

Codeception vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Codeception vs Selenium

Advice on Selenium, Codeception

Detailed Comparison

What are some alternatives to Selenium, Codeception?

BrowserStack

Sauce Labs

LambdaTest

Karma

Robot Framework

Karate DSL

Playwright

Rainforest QA

WebdriverIO

Cucumber

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana