Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
Code Climate vs Credo: What are the differences?
Code Climate: Automated Ruby Code Review. After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots; Credo: A static code analysis tool for the Elixir language. credo can show you refactoring opportunities in your code, complex and duplicated code fragments, warn you about common mistakes, show inconsistencies in your naming scheme and - if needed - help you enforce a desired coding style.
Code Climate and Credo can be primarily classified as "Code Review" tools.
Credo is an open source tool with 2.96K GitHub stars and 215 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Credo's open source repository on GitHub.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn MorePros of Code Climate
Pros of Credo
Pros of Code Climate
- Auto sync with Github71
- Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean49
- Better coding45
- Free for open source29
- Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates21
- Continued encouragement to a have better / cleaner code15
- Great UI13
- Makes you a better coder11
- Duplication Detection10
- Safe and Secure5
- Private2
- Locally Installable API1
- Uses rubocop1
- Extremely accurate in telling you the errors1
- GitHub only1
- Python inspection1
- great open community1
- GitHub integration, status inline in PRs1
Pros of Credo
Be the first to leave a pro
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Code Climate
Cons of Credo
Cons of Code Climate
- Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint2
- Complains about small stylistic decisions1
Cons of Credo
Be the first to leave a con
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
No Stats
- No public GitHub repository available -
What is Code Climate?
After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.
What is Credo?
credo can show you refactoring opportunities in your code, complex and duplicated code fragments, warn you about common mistakes, show inconsistencies in your naming scheme and - if needed - help you enforce a desired coding style.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jobs that mention Code Climate and Credo as a desired skillset
What companies use Code Climate?
What companies use Credo?
What companies use Credo?
See which teams inside your own company are using Code Climate or Credo.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Code Climate?
What tools integrate with Credo?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+26 29
15555
+44 109
50340
What are some alternatives to Code Climate and Credo?
Codacy
Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.
Codecov
Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.
Coveralls
Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.
SonarQube
SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
GitPrime
GitPrime uses data from GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket—or any Git based code repository—to help engineering leaders move faster, optimize work patterns, and advocate for engineering with concrete data.