StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Code Climate vs Codecov

Code Climate vs Codecov

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Code Climate
Code Climate
Stacks740
Followers497
Votes285
Codecov
Codecov
Stacks2.8K
Followers324
Votes102

Code Climate vs Codecov: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Code Climate and Codecov

1. Code Coverage Tools: Code Climate primarily focuses on static analysis and code quality metrics, providing insights into code complexity, duplication, and maintainability. On the other hand, Codecov specializes in code coverage analysis, allowing developers to measure how much of their code is exercised by tests.

2. Integration Methods: Code Climate seamlessly integrates with various code hosting platforms, providing pull request analysis and code review comments. It supports multiple languages and offers a simple setup process. In contrast, Codecov integrates with popular CI/CD tools, allowing developers to upload coverage reports generated by test frameworks. It provides a comprehensive overview of code coverage through visual reports.

3. Pricing Structure: Code Climate offers different pricing tiers based on the number of seats or users, ensuring flexibility for small teams and large enterprises. Price plans include additional features like collaboration tools and advanced security features. On the other hand, Codecov provides various pricing plans based on the number of repositories and parallel jobs required for coverage analysis.

4. Customization and Configuration: Code Climate provides a wide range of customizable settings and configuration options, allowing developers to tailor the analysis to their specific needs. This includes adjusting thresholds for maintainability, complexity, and code duplication. Codecov, on the other hand, primarily focuses on providing comprehensive code coverage analysis with limited customization options.

5. Development Workflow Integration: Code Climate offers a seamless integration into developers' daily workflow by integrating with popular IDEs and providing a command-line interface. It also offers integrations with Slack and other collaboration tools to facilitate communication and collaboration within the development team. Codecov, while offering integrations with CI/CD tools, does not provide as many integrations with IDEs or other developer-oriented tools.

6. Feedback and Support: Code Climate provides comprehensive documentation and in-app user guides, making it easy for developers to understand the results and suggestions provided. It also offers dedicated support channels, including email and live chat. Codecov, while offering documentation and support, may not provide the same level of on-demand assistance and personalized support options as Code Climate.

In Summary, Code Climate focuses on static analysis and code quality metrics, offers integration with code hosting platforms, customizable settings, comprehensive documentation, and personalized support. In contrast, Codecov specializes in code coverage analysis, integrates with popular CI/CD tools, provides visual reports, and offers different pricing plans based on repositories and parallel jobs required.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Code Climate, Codecov

Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Code Climate
Code Climate
Codecov
Codecov

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.

Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.;Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.;Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.;Team Sharing- Instant access for your whole team to maximize code visibility across projects.;Hotspots- A hit list for refactoring. Target your messiest areas one-by-one.;Duplication Detection- Fuzzy matching algorithm finds DRY-violations that human reviewers might miss.;Email Notification- Instant email notifications to let you know when new security and code issues arise;Security Dashboard- Organized listing of your app's vulnerabilities, including when they were first introduced and how to address them.;Alerts for New Rails Disclosures- Going beyond Gemfile analysis to let you know whether you're at high risk based on how your specific code uses a vulnerable library.;Start Fixing with One Click- Full integration with Pivotal Tracker, GitHub Issues, and Lighthouse lets you open tickets instantly.;GitHub Integration- Post-receive hooks for instant updates and GitHub drilldown links throughout.;Test Coverage Integration- Surfacing coverage information at the repo, class, and source listing level.;Private, Safe, and Secure- All data is private by default. SSL encryption everywhere.
Beautiful Reports;Pull Request Comments;Interactive Commit Graphs;Chrome Extension;Github Commit Status;Easy to Integrate;Hipchat Integration
Statistics
Stacks
740
Stacks
2.8K
Followers
497
Followers
324
Votes
285
Votes
102
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 71
    Auto sync with Github
  • 49
    Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean
  • 45
    Better coding
  • 30
    Free for open source
  • 21
    Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates
Cons
  • 2
    Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint
  • 1
    Complains about small stylistic decisions
Pros
  • 17
    Easy setup
  • 17
    More stable than coveralls
  • 14
    GitHub integration
  • 11
    They reply their users
  • 10
    Easy setup,great ui
Cons
  • 1
    GitHub org / team integration is a little too tight
  • 0
    Support does not respond to email
  • 0
    Delayed results by hours since recent outage
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
HipChat
HipChat
Campfire
Campfire
Semaphore
Semaphore
HipChat
HipChat
Jenkins
Jenkins
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
CircleCI
CircleCI
Heroku
Heroku

What are some alternatives to Code Climate, Codecov?

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Coveralls

Coveralls

Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana