StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Cocoa (OS X) vs Revel

Cocoa (OS X) vs Revel

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Revel
Revel
Stacks36
Followers100
Votes38
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks1.4K
Cocoa (OS X)
Cocoa (OS X)
Stacks39
Followers52
Votes6

Cocoa (OS X) vs Revel: What are the differences?

  1. Language: Cocoa is primarily based on Objective-C programming language, while Revel is a Golang web framework. This means developers need to have different skill sets to work on each platform.

  2. Platform: Cocoa is specific to the macOS and iOS platforms, providing APIs and frameworks for native app development, while Revel is more focused on web development and is agnostic to the underlying operating system.

  3. Community Support: Cocoa boasts a large community of developers creating native applications for Apple devices, offering extensive support and resources. On the other hand, Revel has a smaller community due to its focus on Golang, which may limit the availability of resources and assistance.

  4. Usage: Cocoa is commonly used for creating desktop and mobile applications, leveraging the native capabilities of Apple devices, while Revel is used for building web applications and APIs, making it more suitable for server-side development.

  5. Integration: Cocoa seamlessly integrates with Apple's ecosystem, allowing developers to leverage features such as iCloud, Siri, and Touch ID, while Revel offers integrations with various libraries and tools for rapid development in the Golang environment.

  6. Dependencies: Cocoa relies heavily on Apple's development tools and frameworks like Xcode and UIKit, whereas Revel leverages the simplicity and efficiency of Golang's standard libraries, reducing the need for additional dependencies.

In Summary, Cocoa and Revel differ in terms of language, platform, community support, usage, integration, and dependencies.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Revel
Revel
Cocoa (OS X)
Cocoa (OS X)

Revel makes it easy to build web applications using the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern by relying on conventions that require a certain structure in your application. In return, it is very light on configuration and enables an extremely fast development cycle.

Much of Cocoa is implemented in Objective-C, an object-oriented language that is compiled to run at incredible speed, yet employs a truly dynamic runtime making it uniquely flexible. Because Objective-C is a superset of C, it is easy to mix C and even C++ into your Cocoa applications.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
36
Stacks
39
Followers
100
Followers
52
Votes
38
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 16
    Go
  • 6
    High-Productivity
  • 5
    Full-Stack
  • 4
    High performance
  • 4
    MVC
Pros
  • 3
    Great community
  • 2
    IOS
  • 1
    Backed by apple
Integrations
Golang
Golang
Objective-C
Objective-C

What are some alternatives to Revel, Cocoa (OS X)?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase