Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

Cockpit vs Webmin: What are the differences?

Cockpit and Webmin are web-based administration tools that provide a graphical interface for managing Linux servers. Let's explore the key differences between Cockpit and Webmin in more detail:

  1. User Interface: Cockpit has a modern and user-friendly interface with a responsive design. It provides a sleek and intuitive dashboard that allows users to easily navigate and manage various aspects of their Linux server. Webmin, on the other hand, has a more traditional interface that may feel familiar to users who are accustomed to classic system administration tools. It offers a comprehensive menu-based interface with various modules for managing different server components.

  2. Scope of Management: Cockpit primarily focuses on managing individual Linux servers. It provides features for monitoring system resources, managing services, configuring network settings, and accessing system logs. It is designed to provide a streamlined experience for server administration. Webmin, on the other hand, offers a broader scope of management. It supports not only Linux servers but also other Unix-like systems, including FreeBSD and Solaris. Webmin provides a wide range of modules for managing system configuration, users and groups, file systems, network services, and more.

  3. User Access Control: Cockpit integrates with the underlying system's user authentication mechanism, such as PAM (Pluggable Authentication Modules), and relies on the system's user accounts for access control. It allows administrators to assign specific permissions to different users or groups. Webmin, on the other hand, has its own user management system. It provides a web-based interface for creating and managing user accounts within Webmin itself. Administrators can define fine-grained access controls for each user, specifying the modules and actions they can perform.

  4. Extensibility and Customization: Cockpit has a focused set of built-in features and is designed to provide a consistent user experience across different Linux distributions. While it offers some extensibility through add-ons, the options for customization are more limited compared to Webmin. Webmin, on the other hand, provides a highly modular architecture that allows for extensive customization and integration with third-party modules. Users can install additional modules to extend Webmin's functionality and tailor it to their specific needs.

  5. Package Availability: Cockpit is included by default in many modern Linux distributions, such as CentOS, Fedora, and Ubuntu, making it readily available for installation without additional steps. Webmin, on the other hand, needs to be manually installed and configured on the server. It is available as a separate package that needs to be downloaded and installed from the Webmin website.

  6. Target Audience: Cockpit is designed with simplicity and ease of use in mind, making it suitable for both novice and experienced administrators. It is well-suited for individual server management and is particularly popular among desktop users and small-scale deployments. Webmin, on the other hand, caters to more advanced users and system administrators who require a comprehensive set of tools for managing multiple servers or a broader range of system configurations.

In summary, Cockpit and Webmin are web-based administration tools for managing Linux servers, each with its own strengths and target audience. Cockpit provides a modern and user-friendly interface with a focus on individual server management, while Webmin offers a broader scope of management and extensive customization options.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Cockpit
Pros of Webmin
  • 3
    Flexible and plays nicely with any frontend
  • 3
    Easy for Content Managers to understand and use
  • 3
    Open Source
  • 2
    Fast & lightweight
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
    Self hosted
  • 3
    Review real-time resources (cpu, mem, stg, proc)
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
    DNS Zone Editor
  • 1
    Modify ports and usage
  • 1
    Extensible and flexible
  • 1
    Modify applications

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Cockpit?

An API-driven CMS without forcing you to make compromises in how you implement your site. The CMS for developers. Manage content like collections, regions, forms and galleries which you can reuse anywhere on your website.

What is Webmin?

It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Cockpit?
What companies use Webmin?
See which teams inside your own company are using Cockpit or Webmin.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Cockpit?
What tools integrate with Webmin?
    No integrations found
    What are some alternatives to Cockpit and Webmin?
    Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.
    It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.
    Netdata democratizes monitoring, empowering IT teams to know more about their infrastructure, enabling them to quickly identify and troubleshoot issues, collaborate to solve problems, and make data-driven decisions to move business forward.
    Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.
    Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.
    See all alternatives