Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

coala

39
45
+ 1
0
Credo

9
11
+ 1
0
Add tool

coala vs Credo: What are the differences?

Developers describe coala as "Linting and fixing code for all languages". coala is a language independent analysis toolkit. It empowers developers to create rules which a project's code should conform to. coala takes care of showing these issues to users in a friendly manner, is versatile and can be used in any environment. On the other hand, Credo is detailed as "A static code analysis tool for the Elixir language". credo can show you refactoring opportunities in your code, complex and duplicated code fragments, warn you about common mistakes, show inconsistencies in your naming scheme and - if needed - help you enforce a desired coding style.

coala and Credo belong to "Code Review" category of the tech stack.

coala and Credo are both open source tools. It seems that Credo with 2.96K GitHub stars and 215 forks on GitHub has more adoption than coala with 2.82K GitHub stars and 1.33K GitHub forks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of coala
Pros of Credo
  • 0
    Can be run locally with Docker
  • 0
    Can fix problems automatically
  • 0
    Supports many languages
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    No Stats
    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is coala?

    coala is a language independent analysis toolkit. It empowers developers to create rules which a project's code should conform to. coala takes care of showing these issues to users in a friendly manner, is versatile and can be used in any environment.

    What is Credo?

    credo can show you refactoring opportunities in your code, complex and duplicated code fragments, warn you about common mistakes, show inconsistencies in your naming scheme and - if needed - help you enforce a desired coding style.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention coala and Credo as a desired skillset
    CBRE
    United States of America Texas Richardson
    CBRE
    United States of America Texas Richardson
    CBRE
    United States of America Texas Richardson
    CBRE
    United States of America Texas Richardson
    CBRE
    United States of America Texas Richardson
    What companies use coala?
    What companies use Credo?
    See which teams inside your own company are using coala or Credo.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with coala?
    What tools integrate with Credo?
      No integrations found
      What are some alternatives to coala and Credo?
      ESLint
      A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.
      Prettier
      Prettier is an opinionated code formatter. It enforces a consistent style by parsing your code and re-printing it with its own rules that take the maximum line length into account, wrapping code when necessary.
      TSLint
      An extensible static analysis tool that checks TypeScript code for readability, maintainability, and functionality errors. It is widely supported across modern editors & build systems and can be customized with your own lint rules, configurations, and formatters.
      SonarQube
      SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
      Stylelint
      A mighty, modern CSS linter that helps you enforce consistent conventions and avoid errors in your stylesheets.
      See all alternatives