Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Cisco IronPort vs Mimecast: What are the differences?
Cisco IronPort and Mimecast are two popular email security solutions used by organizations worldwide. Below are the key differences between Cisco IronPort and Mimecast:
Email Security Features: Cisco IronPort provides a robust set of email security features such as anti-spam, anti-malware, data loss prevention, and encryption. Mimecast, on the other hand, offers advanced threat protection, URL protection, attachment sandboxing, and secure messaging capabilities.
Deployment Options: Cisco IronPort is available as both on-premises hardware appliances and cloud-based solutions, providing flexibility in deployment options based on organizational needs. Mimecast, however, is primarily a cloud-based service, offering ease of scalability and management without the need for on-premises infrastructure.
Integration Capabilities: Cisco IronPort integrates well with other Cisco security products, providing a cohesive security ecosystem for organizations already using Cisco solutions. Mimecast, on the other hand, offers integrations with a wide range of third-party applications and services, enhancing its compatibility and interoperability with various systems.
User Interface and Experience: Cisco IronPort offers a more traditional and technical user interface, which might require some technical expertise to navigate and configure. Mimecast provides a more user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easier for non-technical users to manage and monitor email security settings.
Customer Support and Service Level Agreements (SLAs): Cisco IronPort offers comprehensive customer support with service level agreements (SLAs) for response times and issue resolution. Mimecast provides dedicated support teams and personalized services to ensure high customer satisfaction and quick resolution of any email security issues.
Scalability and Pricing: Cisco IronPort is known for its scalability, making it suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises. Mimecast also offers scalable solutions but may be more cost-effective for organizations with a larger user base due to its pricing structure based on the number of users.
In Summary, Cisco IronPort and Mimecast differ in terms of email security features, deployment options, integration capabilities, user interface, customer support, and scalability, providing organizations with a choice based on their specific requirements and preferences.
