Chronix vs Noms: What are the differences?

Developers describe Chronix as "A fast and efficient time series storage based on Apache Lucene and Apache Solr". Chronix is built to store time series highly compressed and for fast access times. In comparison to related time series databases, Chronix does not only take 5 to 171 times less space, but it also shaves off 83% of the access time, and up to 78% off the runtime on a mix of real world queries. On the other hand, Noms is detailed as "A new decentralized database based on ideas from Git". Noms is a new database that makes it easy to store, move, and collaborate on large-scale structured data. Noms gives you the entire Git workflow, but for large-scale structured (or unstructured) data. Fork, merge, track history, efficiently synchronize changes, etc.

Chronix and Noms can be primarily classified as "Databases" tools.

Chronix and Noms are both open source tools. It seems that Noms with 6.91K GitHub stars and 251 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Chronix with 247 GitHub stars and 23 GitHub forks.