StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. Castle vs PostSharp

Castle vs PostSharp

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Castle
Castle
Stacks47
Followers62
Votes0
PostSharp
PostSharp
Stacks43
Followers18
Votes0

Castle vs PostSharp: What are the differences?

### Introduction
Key differences between Castle and PostSharp in the context of .NET development are:

1. **Architecture and Scope**: Castle offers a complete set of tools and libraries for various aspects of .NET development including IoC containers, dynamic proxies, and aspect-oriented programming. On the other hand, PostSharp specifically focuses on aspect-oriented programming with its powerful and comprehensive set of AOP features.

2. **Ease of Use**: Castle tends to be more flexible and configurable as it allows developers to choose only the components they need for their projects. In contrast, PostSharp offers a more out-of-the-box solution with built-in aspects that are easier to set up and use without having to configure multiple components separately.

3. **Performance Impact**: Castle dynamic proxies are known to have a higher performance overhead compared to PostSharp's aspect weaving approach. PostSharp statically weaves aspects into the code during build time, leading to less runtime overhead and better performance in some scenarios.

4. **Community Support and Adoption**: Castle has been around for a longer time and has a strong community backing with a wide range of contributors and users. PostSharp, although newer, has gained popularity for its focus on AOP and simplicity in implementing cross-cutting concerns in .NET applications.

5. **Licensing Model**: Castle is an open-source project under the Apache License 2.0, allowing developers to use and modify the code without any licensing fees. In contrast, PostSharp offers both free and commercial licenses, providing additional support and advanced features for paid users.

6. **Integration with Visual Studio**: PostSharp provides seamless integration with Visual Studio through its extension, making it easier for developers to configure and apply aspects directly within the IDE. Castle, while still usable within Visual Studio, may require more manual setup and configuration compared to PostSharp's integrated experience.

In Summary, the key differences between Castle and PostSharp in .NET development lie in their architecture, ease of use, performance impact, community support, licensing model, and integration with Visual Studio.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Castle
Castle
PostSharp
PostSharp

Castle looks for suspicious login patterns without bothering the legitimate user nor the site administrator. The fully-automated anti-hijack engine identifies potential account compromises based on where the user logs in from and how they navigate the site.

PostSharp enables developers to eradicate boilerplate by offloading repetitive work from humans to machines using aspects: special kinds of custom attributes that modify the behavior of code they are applied to.

Security Analytics; Threat Alerts; Login Notification Emails; Threat Segments; Adaptive Authentication
Aspect-oriented programming. Ready-made aspects: logging, caching, threading, WPF, code contracts
Statistics
Stacks
47
Stacks
43
Followers
62
Followers
18
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET
.NET
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
.NET Core
.NET Core

What are some alternatives to Castle, PostSharp?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Spacemacs

Spacemacs

Since version 0.101.0 and later Spacemacs totally abolishes the frontiers between Vim and Emacs. The user can now choose his/her preferred editing style and enjoy all the Spacemacs features. Even better, it is possible to dynamically switch between the two styles seamlessly which makes it possible for programmers with different styles to do seat pair programming using the same editor.

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ReSharper

ReSharper

It is a popular developer productivity extension for Microsoft Visual Studio. It automates most of what can be automated in your coding routines. It finds compiler errors, runtime errors, redundancies, and code smells right as you type, suggesting intelligent corrections for them.

SpaceVim

SpaceVim

SpaceVim is a Modular configuration, a bundle of custom settings and plugins, for Vim. It got inspired by spacemacs.

Vim-Plug

Vim-Plug

A minimalist Vim plugin manager.

Kite

Kite

Your editor and web browser don't know anything about each other, which is why you end up continuously switching between them. Kite bridges that gap, bringing an internet-connected programming experience right alongside your editor.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp