StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Caching
  4. Web Cache
  5. Cashew vs Varnish

Cashew vs Varnish

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Varnish
Varnish
Stacks12.6K
Followers2.7K
Votes370
GitHub Stars887
Forks195
Cashew
Cashew
Stacks5
Followers10
Votes0

Cashew vs Varnish: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Cashew and Varnish

Cashew and Varnish are both popular caching solutions. However, there are distinct differences between the two that can impact their performance and suitability for various use cases.

1. **Architecture**: Cashew is a disk-based cache system that stores data on the disk to preserve cache across server restarts, while Varnish is an in-memory caching system that stores data only in memory, providing faster access times but requiring more memory resources.

2. **HTTP Support**: Varnish is specifically designed as an HTTP accelerator and cache, optimized for handling HTTP requests and responses, while Cashew can work with various types of data beyond just HTTP, making it more versatile in caching different types of content.

3. **Configuration Flexibility**: Varnish offers more advanced configuration options and flexibility through its VCL (Varnish Configuration Language), allowing users to fine-tune caching rules and behaviors, whereas Cashew may be simpler to configure for basic use cases without the need for extensive scripting.

4. **Ecosystem and Community**: Varnish has a larger ecosystem and community support, with a rich set of plugins, extensions, and documentation available, making it easier to integrate with other tools and systems, while Cashew, being less popular, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for support and integration.

5. **Performance Optimization**: Varnish is known for its high-performance capabilities, particularly in handling large volumes of traffic and serving content quickly, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications, whereas Cashew may not scale as well under heavy load due to its disk-based architecture.

6. **Cache Invalidation**: Cashew offers more granular control over cache invalidation, allowing users to manually purge specific cache entries based on custom rules or events, whereas Varnish may have more limited options for cache invalidation, requiring more manual intervention for custom cache clearing strategies.

In Summary, the key differences between Cashew and Varnish lie in their architecture, HTTP support, configuration flexibility, ecosystem and community, performance optimization, and cache invalidation capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Varnish
Varnish
Cashew
Cashew

Varnish Cache is a web application accelerator also known as a caching HTTP reverse proxy. You install it in front of any server that speaks HTTP and configure it to cache the contents. Varnish Cache is really, really fast. It typically speeds up delivery with a factor of 300 - 1000x, depending on your architecture.

A simple, fast, and elegant app to manage your Github Issues.

Powerful, feature-rich web cache;HTTP accelerator; Speed up the performance of your website and streaming services
GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise support.;Ability to view issue details, assign to users, add labels, attach milestone, comment on issues and much more.;Ability to save common search queries for quick access.;Fast and powerful offline issue search.;Batch update assignee, labels, and milestone on issues.;Access public, private, and private organization repositories.;Read only offline mode
Statistics
GitHub Stars
887
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
195
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
12.6K
Stacks
5
Followers
2.7K
Followers
10
Votes
370
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 104
    High-performance
  • 67
    Very Fast
  • 57
    Very Stable
  • 44
    Very Robust
  • 37
    HTTP reverse proxy
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to Varnish, Cashew?

Section

Section

Edge Compute Platform gives Dev and Ops engineers the access and control they need to run compute workloads on a distributed edge.

Squid

Squid

Squid reduces bandwidth and improves response times by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages. Squid has extensive access controls and makes a great server accelerator. It runs on most available operating systems, including Windows and is licensed under the GNU GPL.

Nuster

Nuster

nuster is a high performance HTTP proxy cache server and RESTful NoSQL cache server based on HAProxy.

Remergr.io

Remergr.io

Keep your pull requests automatically up-to-date and resolve your pull requests' conflicts directly from GitHub's UI. Save hundreds of hours you spend resolving conflicts by keeping always your pull requests automatically up-to-date to reduce the chance of conflicts. If conflicts are found, you can straightforwardly resolve them on GitHub's UI with a click of a button.

Astral

Astral

Astral pulls down all of your starred repositories on GitHub and allows you to organize them using one or more tags.

TravisBuddy

TravisBuddy

TravisBuddy is a cloud service that creates comments in failed pull requests and tell the author what went wrong and what they can do to fix it.

Insight.io for Github

Insight.io for Github

Improve GitHub code browsing experience by decorating file page with x-ref. Insight.io understands the semantics of a lot of Java, Scala, C++/C, Ruby, Python, PHP repositories at github.

Octokit

Octokit

It is a client library targeting .NET 4.5 and above that provides an easy way to interact with the GitHub API.

Apache Traffic Server

Apache Traffic Server

It is a fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2.0 compliant caching proxy server.Improve your response time, while reducing server load and bandwidth needs by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages, images, and web ser

Release

Release

When run, this command line interface automatically generates a new GitHub Release and populates it with the changes (commits) made since the last release.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana