Capybara vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?
Developers describe Capybara as "Acceptance test framework for web applications". Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem. On the other hand, Visual Studio Code is detailed as "Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft". Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.
Capybara can be classified as a tool in the "Testing Frameworks" category, while Visual Studio Code is grouped under "Text Editor".
"Best acceptance test framework for Ruby on Rails apps" is the top reason why over 7 developers like Capybara, while over 237 developers mention "Powerful multilanguage IDE" as the leading cause for choosing Visual Studio Code.
Capybara and Visual Studio Code are both open source tools. It seems that Visual Studio Code with 78.4K GitHub stars and 10.9K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Capybara with 8.82K GitHub stars and 1.29K GitHub forks.
Asana, Intuit, and Yahoo! are some of the popular companies that use Visual Studio Code, whereas Capybara is used by GrowthHackers, sQuidd.io, and Indiegogo. Visual Studio Code has a broader approval, being mentioned in 1104 company stacks & 2301 developers stacks; compared to Capybara, which is listed in 38 company stacks and 20 developer stacks.
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Capybara?
What is Visual Studio Code?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions