CakePHP vs Slim

Overview

CakePHP

Stacks672

Followers401

Votes137

GitHub Stars8.8K

Forks3.4K

Slim

Stacks273

Followers391

Votes152

GitHub Stars12.2K

Forks2.0K

CakePHP vs Slim: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between CakePHP and Slim:


1. **Framework Type**: CakePHP is a full-stack framework with a lot of built-in features like database access, caching, and validation. On the other hand, Slim is a micro-framework which means it provides only the essential features like routing, middleware, and request/response handling, allowing developers more flexibility to choose and add components as needed.

2. **Learning Curve**: CakePHP has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and conventions that need to be followed. Slim, being a micro-framework, has a shorter learning curve as it is lightweight and does not have a lot of predefined rules or conventions, making it easier for developers to get started quickly.

3. **Community Support**: CakePHP has a large and established community with plenty of resources and documentation available, making it easier for beginners to find help and solutions to their problems. Slim, being a smaller framework, has a smaller community which can sometimes result in limited resources and support for developers.

4. **Performance**: CakePHP, due to its full-stack nature and built-in features, may have slightly higher memory consumption and slower performance compared to Slim. Slim, being a micro-framework, is lightweight and fast, making it a better choice for projects where speed and performance are crucial.

5. **Flexibility**: CakePHP follows a strict MVC (Model-View-Controller) structure which can sometimes limit flexibility in design or development approach. Slim, being minimalist, offers more flexibility in terms of architecture and design patterns, allowing developers to choose their preferred way of structuring the application.

6. **Customization**: CakePHP comes with a lot of built-in functionalities which can sometimes be overwhelming for smaller projects or specific requirements. Slim, on the other hand, allows for more customization and flexibility as developers can choose and add only the components they need, keeping the codebase lean and efficient.

In Summary, CakePHP and Slim differ in terms of framework type, learning curve, community support, performance, flexibility, and customization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

CakePHP	Slim
It makes building web applications simpler, faster, while requiring less code. A modern PHP 7 framework offering a flexible database access layer and a powerful scaffolding system.	Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.
Use code generation and scaffolding features to rapidly build prototypes; No complicated XML or YAML files. Just setup your database and you're ready to bake; Instead of having to plan where things go, CakePHP comes with a set of conventions to guide you in developing your application; The things you need are built-in. Translations, database access, caching, validation, authentication, and much more are all built into one of the original PHP MVC frameworks	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8.8K	GitHub Stars 12.2K
GitHub Forks 3.4K	GitHub Forks 2.0K
Stacks 672	Stacks 273
Followers 401	Followers 391
Votes 137	Votes 152
Pros & Cons
Pros 35 Open source 25 Really rapid framework 19 Good code organization 13 Flexibility 10 Security best practices Cons 1 Robust Baking Tool 1 Follows Good Programming Practices	Pros 33 Microframework 27 API 22 Open source 21 Php 11 Fast
Integrations
PHP	PHP

What are some alternatives to CakePHP, Slim?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

CakePHP vs Slim: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between CakePHP and Slim:


1. **Framework Type**: CakePHP is a full-stack framework with a lot of built-in features like database access, caching, and validation. On the other hand, Slim is a micro-framework which means it provides only the essential features like routing, middleware, and request/response handling, allowing developers more flexibility to choose and add components as needed.

2. **Learning Curve**: CakePHP has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and conventions that need to be followed. Slim, being a micro-framework, has a shorter learning curve as it is lightweight and does not have a lot of predefined rules or conventions, making it easier for developers to get started quickly.

3. **Community Support**: CakePHP has a large and established community with plenty of resources and documentation available, making it easier for beginners to find help and solutions to their problems. Slim, being a smaller framework, has a smaller community which can sometimes result in limited resources and support for developers.

4. **Performance**: CakePHP, due to its full-stack nature and built-in features, may have slightly higher memory consumption and slower performance compared to Slim. Slim, being a micro-framework, is lightweight and fast, making it a better choice for projects where speed and performance are crucial.

5. **Flexibility**: CakePHP follows a strict MVC (Model-View-Controller) structure which can sometimes limit flexibility in design or development approach. Slim, being minimalist, offers more flexibility in terms of architecture and design patterns, allowing developers to choose their preferred way of structuring the application.

6. **Customization**: CakePHP comes with a lot of built-in functionalities which can sometimes be overwhelming for smaller projects or specific requirements. Slim, on the other hand, allows for more customization and flexibility as developers can choose and add only the components they need, keeping the codebase lean and efficient.

In Summary, CakePHP and Slim differ in terms of framework type, learning curve, community support, performance, flexibility, and customization.

CakePHP vs Slim

Overview