StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. C# vs Handlebars.js

C# vs Handlebars.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

C#
C#
Stacks70.1K
Followers46.3K
Votes2.2K
Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Stacks8.3K
Followers3.2K
Votes308

C# vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides the key differences between C# and Handlebars.js. These differences are specific and formatted to be used in a website.

  1. Syntax: C# uses a C-style syntax, similar to Java and C++, while Handlebars.js uses a templating syntax inspired by Mustache, which uses double curly braces {{}} for placeholders and # and / for blocks.
  2. Platform: C# is a programming language typically used with the .NET framework, while Handlebars.js is a JavaScript library designed for client-side templating in web applications.
  3. Data Binding: C# supports two-way data binding, where changes in the data model are automatically reflected in the UI and vice versa. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, only supports one-way data binding, where changes in the data model are reflected in the UI, but changes in the UI do not update the data model.
  4. Server-side vs Client-side: C# is primarily used for server-side development, handling business logic and interacting with databases. Handlebars.js, being a client-side library, is used for rendering dynamic content on the client-side, reducing server load and improving performance.
  5. Compiled vs Interpreted: C# code is compiled into an executable format before execution, resulting in better performance and error checking. Handlebars.js, being a JavaScript library, is interpreted by the client's browser at runtime, introducing a slight overhead in performance and fewer opportunities for error checking during development.
  6. Language Features: C# is a full-fledged programming language with features like object-oriented programming, generics, strong typing, and extensive library support. Handlebars.js, being a templating library, focuses on providing a simple and lightweight syntax for rendering templates and does not offer the same level of language features as C#.

In summary, C# and Handlebars.js differ in their syntax, platform usage, data binding capabilities, server-side vs client-side execution, compilation vs interpretation, and language features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on C#, Handlebars.js

Andrew
Andrew

Chief Software Architect at Xelex Digital, LLC

Jun 27, 2020

Decided

In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.

To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.

Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.

For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.

That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.

We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.

As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.

446k views446k
Comments
Erik
Erik

Chief Architect at LiveTiles

May 18, 2020

Decided

C# and .Net were obvious choices for us at LiveTiles given our investment in the Microsoft ecosystem. It enabled us to harness of the .Net framework to build ASP.Net MVC, WebAPI, and Serverless applications very easily. Coupled with the high productivity of Visual Studio, it's the native tongue of Microsoft technology.

614k views614k
Comments
Asad
Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET.NETHandlebars.jsHandlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

C#
C#
Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Statistics
Stacks
70.1K
Stacks
8.3K
Followers
46.3K
Followers
3.2K
Votes
2.2K
Votes
308
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 351
    Cool syntax
  • 294
    Great lambda support
  • 267
    Great generics support
  • 212
    Language integrated query (linq)
  • 181
    Extension methods
Cons
  • 15
    Poor x-platform GUI support
  • 8
    Closed source
  • 7
    Requires DllImportAttribute for getting stuff from unma
  • 7
    Fast and secure
Pros
  • 106
    Simple
  • 76
    Great templating language
  • 50
    Open source
  • 36
    Logicless
  • 20
    Integrates well into any codebase
Integrations
.NET
.NET
Mustache
Mustache

What are some alternatives to C#, Handlebars.js?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Swift

Swift

Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase