Buildbox vs three.js

Overview

Buildbox

Stacks12

Followers37

Votes5

three.js

Stacks825

Followers530

Votes0

GitHub Stars109.2K

Forks36.1K

Buildbox vs three.js: What are the differences?

Programming Language: Buildbox is a no-code platform, meaning you can create games without any programming knowledge, while three.js requires proficiency in JavaScript to create and manipulate 3D objects in a browser environment.
Ease of Use: Buildbox is known for its user-friendly interface and drag-and-drop functionality, making it accessible to beginners and non-programmers, whereas three.js has a steeper learning curve due to its requirement of coding skills.
Flexibility: While Buildbox provides pre-built templates and assets for quick game development, the customization options may be limited compared to the flexibility offered by three.js, which allows for more control over the creation and styling of 3D elements.
Target Platforms: Buildbox primarily targets mobile game development for platforms like iOS and Android, with seamless export features for these devices, while three.js is more versatile and can be used to create 3D experiences on various web browsers and VR devices.
Community Support: Buildbox has a strong and active online community that provides resources, tutorials, and templates for users, making it easier to get started and troubleshoot issues, whereas three.js has a smaller community but offers extensive documentation and examples for developers.
Cost: Buildbox operates on a subscription-based model with different pricing tiers, while three.js is an open-source library, making it free to use and customize for commercial projects without any licensing fees.

In Summary, Buildbox offers a no-code approach to game development with a focus on simplicity and ease of use, while three.js provides more control, flexibility, and customization options for creating 3D animations in browser environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Buildbox	three.js
It is the easiest drag and drop game maker software.Make your own games without coding and export them to iPhone, iPad, Android, Mac, PC and Microconsoles.	It is a cross-browser JavaScript library and Application Programming Interface used to create and display animated 3D computer graphics in a web browser.
3D Game Level; 2D Game Level; UI Screen; X10 Faster Development	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 109.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 36.1K
Stacks 12	Stacks 825
Followers 37	Followers 530
Votes 5	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Because it has been used to make many hit iPhone games 1 Great UI 1 It's easy to gat started with Cons 1 Very Poor 1 Not Popular In Reddit	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Firebase Google AdMob Felgo Vuforia PlayFab Ninject Pushwoosh	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Buildbox, three.js?

Unity

Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers.

Godot

It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world.

Unreal Engine

It is a game engine that helps you make games. It is made up of several components that work together to drive the game. Its massive system of tools and editors allows you to organize your assets and manipulate them to create the gameplay for your game.

Gamemaker Studio 2

It has everything you need to take your idea from concept to finished game. With no barriers to entry and powerful functionality.

Panda3D

It is a game engine that includes graphics, audio, I/O, collision detection, and other abilities relevant to the creation of 3D games.

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

Corona SDK

It is a cross-platform framework ideal for rapidly creating apps and games for mobile devices and desktop systems. It builds rich mobile apps for iOS, Android, Kindle and Nook. Build high quality mobile apps in a fraction of the time.

Amazon Lumberyard

It is a game engine with no royalties or seat fees, frictionless integration with Twitch and AWS, plus much more on the horizon.

AppGameKit

It is an easy to learn game development engine, ideal for Beginners, Hobbyists & Indie developers. It solves many problems caused by mobile device fragmentation. With it you can code your game once and then deploy your game to multiple platforms. Different resolutions and input systems are all easily handled by it.

Phaser

It is a free open source HTML5 game framework. It uses Pixi.js for WebGL and Canvas rendering across desktop and mobile web browsers. Games can be compiled to iOS and Android apps via 3rd party tools.

Related Comparisons

Buildbox vs three.js: What are the differences?

Programming Language: Buildbox is a no-code platform, meaning you can create games without any programming knowledge, while three.js requires proficiency in JavaScript to create and manipulate 3D objects in a browser environment.
Ease of Use: Buildbox is known for its user-friendly interface and drag-and-drop functionality, making it accessible to beginners and non-programmers, whereas three.js has a steeper learning curve due to its requirement of coding skills.
Flexibility: While Buildbox provides pre-built templates and assets for quick game development, the customization options may be limited compared to the flexibility offered by three.js, which allows for more control over the creation and styling of 3D elements.
Target Platforms: Buildbox primarily targets mobile game development for platforms like iOS and Android, with seamless export features for these devices, while three.js is more versatile and can be used to create 3D experiences on various web browsers and VR devices.
Community Support: Buildbox has a strong and active online community that provides resources, tutorials, and templates for users, making it easier to get started and troubleshoot issues, whereas three.js has a smaller community but offers extensive documentation and examples for developers.
Cost: Buildbox operates on a subscription-based model with different pricing tiers, while three.js is an open-source library, making it free to use and customize for commercial projects without any licensing fees.

Buildbox vs three.js

Overview