Buffalo vs Go

Overview

Golang

Stacks24.0K

Followers13.9K

Votes3.3K

GitHub Stars130.7K

Forks18.4K

Buffalo

Stacks13

Followers50

Votes5

GitHub Stars8.3K

Forks585

Buffalo vs Go: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Buffalo and Go are two frameworks used for web development, but they have key differences that set them apart. 

1. **File Structure**: In Buffalo, the file structure is opinionated and follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) pattern, making it easier for developers to organize their code. On the other hand, Go leaves the file structure open to the developer's interpretation, providing more flexibility but requiring more effort to set up a structured codebase.
   
2. **Code Generation**: Buffalo comes with a powerful code generation tool, pop, which automates the creation of models, migrations, and other resources. Go does not offer such a tool, meaning developers using Go have to write more code manually.
   
3. **Database Integration**: Buffalo has built-in support for the pop ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) library, making it easy to work with databases in an object-oriented way. In contrast, Go does not have a specific ORM library integrated, requiring developers to choose and integrate third-party libraries for database interaction.
   
4. **Front-end Development**: Buffalo includes Webpack and Yarn to manage front-end assets and dependencies, making it easier to build and bundle front-end code. Go, being a programming language, does not focus on front-end development tools and requires developers to set up their own toolchain for managing front-end assets.
   
5. **Authentication and Authorization**: Buffalo provides built-in authentication and authorization tools, such as the ability to integrate with OAuth providers easily. In Go, developers have to implement authentication and authorization from scratch or integrate third-party packages, adding more complexity to the development process.

6. **Error Handling**: Buffalo provides a robust error handling mechanism, including built-in support for handling different types of errors and responding appropriately. Go, while offering error handling capabilities, requires developers to implement error handling logic manually, leading to potential inconsistencies in error responses. 

In Summary, Buffalo offers a more opinionated and structured approach to web development with built-in tools for code generation, database integration, front-end development, and error handling, while Go provides greater flexibility but requires developers to set up these tools and components themselves.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Golang, Buffalo

Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

When developing a new blockchain, we as a team chose Go lang over Java and other candidates, due to Go being (a) natively suited to concurrency - there are primitives in the language itself (goroutines, channels) that really help with reasoning about concurrency (b) super fast - build time, running, testing are all much faster that Java, this gives a far superior developer experience (c) shorter and stricter than Java - code is much shorter (less verbose), and there is usually one good way to do things, and even the code formatter that is bundled with Go is very opinionated - over a short time this makes reading other people's code far smoother than having to deal with different styles.

You should be aware that Go presently (v1.13) lacks Generics.

267k views267k

Comments

Ítalo

VP Platform Engineering at Lykon

Feb 19, 2020

Decided

We decided to use python to write our ETLs and import them into metabase via a lambda. Before python we tried using Go, but overall go was way more verbose than Python when writing the ETLs. Go also had some issues managing memory when using the S3 upload manager library. This was a deal breaker for us that made us switch to Python.

In the end the solution was much cleaner and maintainable.

261k views261k

Comments

Mohamed

Software Engineer at YottaHQ Inc.

Dec 2, 2019

Decided

PHP is easy to learn and you can get up and running in no time, available on almost all hosting providers and you can find developers easily. It has some great frameworks for building your backend like Symfony and Laravel. However, it can be challenging when running an enterprise and needs some adjustments, very recommended for starting a new project or startup.

208k views208k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Golang	Buffalo
Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.	Buffalo is Go web framework. Yeah, I hate the word "framework" too! Buffalo is different though. Buffalo doesn't want to re-invent wheels like routing and templating. Buffalo is glue that wraps all of the best packages available and makes them all play nicely together.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 130.7K	GitHub Stars 8.3K
GitHub Forks 18.4K	GitHub Forks 585
Stacks 24.0K	Stacks 13
Followers 13.9K	Followers 50
Votes 3.3K	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 557 High-performance 398 Simple, minimal syntax 365 Fun to write 305 Easy concurrency support via goroutines 273 Fast compilation times Cons 43 You waste time in plumbing code catching errors 25 Verbose 23 Packages and their path dependencies are braindead 16 Google's documentations aren't beginer friendly 15 Dependency management when working on multiple projects	Pros 4 Go 1 Friendly Api
Integrations
Revel Martini	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Golang, Buffalo?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

Related Comparisons

Buffalo vs Go: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Buffalo and Go are two frameworks used for web development, but they have key differences that set them apart. 

1. **File Structure**: In Buffalo, the file structure is opinionated and follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) pattern, making it easier for developers to organize their code. On the other hand, Go leaves the file structure open to the developer's interpretation, providing more flexibility but requiring more effort to set up a structured codebase.
   
2. **Code Generation**: Buffalo comes with a powerful code generation tool, pop, which automates the creation of models, migrations, and other resources. Go does not offer such a tool, meaning developers using Go have to write more code manually.
   
3. **Database Integration**: Buffalo has built-in support for the pop ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) library, making it easy to work with databases in an object-oriented way. In contrast, Go does not have a specific ORM library integrated, requiring developers to choose and integrate third-party libraries for database interaction.
   
4. **Front-end Development**: Buffalo includes Webpack and Yarn to manage front-end assets and dependencies, making it easier to build and bundle front-end code. Go, being a programming language, does not focus on front-end development tools and requires developers to set up their own toolchain for managing front-end assets.
   
5. **Authentication and Authorization**: Buffalo provides built-in authentication and authorization tools, such as the ability to integrate with OAuth providers easily. In Go, developers have to implement authentication and authorization from scratch or integrate third-party packages, adding more complexity to the development process.

6. **Error Handling**: Buffalo provides a robust error handling mechanism, including built-in support for handling different types of errors and responding appropriately. Go, while offering error handling capabilities, requires developers to implement error handling logic manually, leading to potential inconsistencies in error responses. 

In Summary, Buffalo offers a more opinionated and structured approach to web development with built-in tools for code generation, database integration, front-end development, and error handling, while Go provides greater flexibility but requires developers to set up these tools and components themselves.

Buffalo vs Go

Overview

Buffalo vs Go: What are the differences?

Share your Stack

Advice on Golang, Buffalo

Detailed Comparison

What are some alternatives to Golang, Buffalo?

Node.js

JavaScript

Python

Rails

PHP

Django

Ruby

Laravel

Java

HTML5

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Buffalo vs Go

Overview

Buffalo vs Go: What are the differences?

Share your Stack

Advice on Golang, Buffalo

Detailed Comparison

What are some alternatives to Golang, Buffalo?

Node.js

JavaScript

Python

Rails

PHP

Django

Ruby

Laravel

Java

HTML5

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase