Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Browserling

12
42
+ 1
0
Nightwatchjs

172
323
+ 1
11
Add tool

Browserling vs Nightwatchjs: What are the differences?

Introduction:
Browserling and Nightwatchjs are two popular tools used for testing web applications. Both have their own unique features and functionalities that cater to different needs of developers and testers.

1. **Automation Testing vs. Cross-Browser Testing**: Nightwatchjs is primarily an automation testing tool that allows developers to write automated tests in JavaScript. On the other hand, Browserling focuses on cross-browser testing, providing a platform where users can test their websites on different browsers and operating systems.

2. **Integration Capabilities**: Nightwatchjs offers seamless integration with popular CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, Travis CI, and TeamCity, allowing for continuous testing in the development pipeline. Browserling, on the other hand, lacks such deep integration capabilities with CI/CD tools, as its main focus is on cross-browser testing.

3. **Programming Language**: Nightwatchjs is based on JavaScript, making it easier for developers who are already familiar with the language to write test scripts. In contrast, Browserling does not require any specific programming language as it focuses on simulating different browsers for testing purposes.

4. **Community Support**: Nightwatchjs has a larger and more active community of developers and testers who contribute to the tool's ecosystem by sharing best practices, plugins, and extensions. Browserling, while having a supportive community, may not be as extensive as Nightwatchjs in terms of support and resources available.

5. **User Interface**: Browserling offers a user-friendly GUI where users can interact with different browsers and test their websites visually. Nightwatchjs, being a command-line tool, may not have the same level of visual interface for testing, as its focus is more on automated testing through scripts and commands.

6. **Cost**: Browserling offers paid subscription plans for users to access its cross-browser testing platform, while Nightwatchjs is an open-source tool available for free. Depending on the budget and requirements of the project, users can choose between the cost-effective option of Nightwatchjs or the comprehensive features of Browserling with a subscription fee.

In Summary, Browserling specializes in cross-browser testing with a visual interface and paid plans, while Nightwatchjs focuses on automation testing with JavaScript, integration capabilities, an open-source model, and strong community support.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Browserling
Pros of Nightwatchjs
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 3
      Open source
    • 2
      Testing
    • 2
      Automates browsers
    • 1
      Better cross browser (use selenium)
    • 1
      Cross-Browser Testing
    • 1
      Multiple Browser Support
    • 1
      Parallel Test Running

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Browserling
    Cons of Nightwatchjs
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 2
        No automatic wait
      • 1
        Less flexibility
      • 1
        Limited native mobile app support
      • 1
        Limited browser support
      • 1
        Configuration complexity

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Browserling?

      We run the browsers on our servers. Fully interactive sessions, not static screenshots. No flash, no applets, nothing to install. Powered entirely by <canvas> and javascript.

      What is Nightwatchjs?

      Nightwatch.js is an easy to use Node.js based End-to-End (E2E) testing solution for browser based apps and websites. It uses the powerful Selenium WebDriver API to perform commands and assertions on DOM elements.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Browserling?
      What companies use Nightwatchjs?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Browserling or Nightwatchjs.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Browserling?
      What tools integrate with Nightwatchjs?
        No integrations found

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to Browserling and Nightwatchjs?
        BrowserStack
        BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.
        CrossBrowserTesting
        It's implemented to ensure a website's functionality and design and includes testing a range of devices and operating systems being used in the market and customer base.
        Selenium
        Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
        Karma
        Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.
        LambdaTest
        LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.
        See all alternatives