Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Browserbite vs Playwright: What are the differences?
Developers describe Browserbite as "Automatic cross browser layout testing". Browserbite looks at the screenshots for you using complex computer vision and machine learning techniques and finds the problems for you. On the other hand, Playwright is detailed as "Node library to automate Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API (By Microsoft)". It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.
Browserbite and Playwright belong to "Browser Testing" category of the tech stack.
Playwright is an open source tool with 10.9K GitHub stars and 282 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Playwright's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Browserbite
Pros of Playwright
- Cross browser15
- Open source11
- Test Runner with Playwright/test9
- Promise based7
- Well documented7
- Execute tests in parallel5
- API Testing5
- Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures5
- Python Support4
- Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail4
- Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json3
- Fastest3
- Context isolation3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Browserbite
Cons of Playwright
- Less help12
- Node based3
- Does not execute outside of browser2
