Overview

RuboCop

Stacks1.1K

Followers222

Votes41

Brakeman

Stacks83

Followers31

Votes0

GitHub Stars7.2K

Forks758

Brakeman vs RuboCop: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Brakeman and RuboCop

1. Purpose: Brakeman is a static analysis security tool specifically designed for Ruby on Rails applications. It focuses on identifying potential security vulnerabilities by analyzing the application's source code. On the other hand, RuboCop is a static code analysis tool for Ruby that focuses on enforcing coding style and conventions. It helps developers write clean and consistent code.

2. Scope of Analysis: Brakeman primarily focuses on security-related issues such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), SQL injection, Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), authentication bypass, etc. It provides detailed reports and alerts developers about potential security vulnerabilities in their Rails applications. RuboCop, on the other hand, focuses on analyzing coding style, best practices, complexity, and potential bugs, providing a comprehensive set of rules to enforce.

3. Level of Automation: Brakeman is highly automated and requires minimal configuration. It can be integrated into the development workflow to automatically scan and report security vulnerabilities without user intervention. RuboCop, on the other hand, is extremely customizable and allows developers to configure the rules and behavior according to their specific requirements. It requires more manual intervention for rule configuration.

4. Output and Reporting: Brakeman generates detailed reports highlighting the identified security vulnerabilities, including the affected code snippets and suggestions for remediation. It provides helpful contextual information, making it easier for developers to understand and fix the issues. RuboCop, on the other hand, primarily reports coding style violations and potential bugs. It provides suggestions for improving code quality and adhering to the preferred coding style.

5. Learning Curve and Configuration: Brakeman is relatively straightforward and requires minimal configuration to get started. It focuses on security-specific rules and its usage is well-documented, making it easier for developers to understand and use effectively. RuboCop, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and requires developers to invest time in understanding the available rules and configuring them according to their preferred coding style.

6. Community and Ecosystem: Brakeman has a relatively smaller community compared to RuboCop. However, it is widely recognized and used in the Ruby on Rails community specifically for security scanning. RuboCop, on the other hand, has a large and active community, with numerous plugins and extensions available. It is widely adopted across various Ruby projects and has established itself as a standard tool for enforcing coding style and best practices.

In Summary, Brakeman is a specialized security tool for detecting potential vulnerabilities in Ruby on Rails applications, while RuboCop is a versatile code analyzer focusing on enforcing coding style and best practices in Ruby.

Advice on RuboCop, Brakeman

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 10, 2020

Review

To communicate isn’t just getting rid of syntax errors and making code work. The code should communicate ideas to people through a programming language that computers can also understand.

You should adopt semantic variables, classes, modules, and methods names. For instance, in Ruby, we avoid using particular prefixes such as is_paid, get_name and set_name. In their places, we use directly paid?, name, and name=.

My advice is to use idiomatic and features that the programming language you use offers to you whenever possible, and figure out ways to better pass the message.

Why wouldn’t we be worried about semantics, typos, and styles? We should care for the quality of our code, and the many concepts that define it. You can start by using a linter to collect some issues from your codebase automatically.

116k views116k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

RuboCop	Brakeman
RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.	Free static analysis security tool for Ruby on Rails. Zero-setup security scans for Rails applications based on source code analysis.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 7.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 758
Stacks 1.1K	Stacks 83
Followers 222	Followers 31
Votes 41	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 9 Open-source 8 Completely free 7 Runs Offline 4 Customizable 4 Follows the Ruby Style Guide by default	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Ruby	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to RuboCop, Brakeman?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.