Blox vs Kubernetes

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Blox

4
34
+ 1
0
Kubernetes

58.3K
50.4K
+ 1
677
Add tool

Blox vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When considering container orchestration options, two popular choices are Blox and Kubernetes. While both serve similar purposes, there are key differences that set them apart in terms of their features and functionalities.

  1. Architecture: Blox is an open-source project by Amazon Web Services that focuses on managing container images and deployments. It offers a more simplified and streamlined architecture compared to Kubernetes, making it easier to set up and use for certain use cases. On the other hand, Kubernetes is a more robust system with a complex architecture that caters to larger-scale applications and environments.

  2. Scalability: Kubernetes is known for its scalability and ability to efficiently manage large clusters of containers. It offers advanced features such as horizontal scaling and auto-scaling based on resource utilization. While Blox also supports scaling, it may not have the same level of flexibility and scalability as Kubernetes, especially for enterprise-grade applications with high demands.

  3. Community Support: Kubernetes has a vibrant and active community with a wide range of contributors and resources available. This strong community support makes it easier to troubleshoot issues, stay updated on the latest developments, and access a plethora of third-party integrations. Blox, while backed by AWS, may have a smaller community and fewer resources compared to Kubernetes.

  4. Ecosystem Integration: Kubernetes has a rich ecosystem with various tools and extensions that complement its core functionalities. It integrates seamlessly with other cloud services and tools, making it a popular choice for organizations looking for a comprehensive solution. Blox, on the other hand, may have limited integration options and may not be as versatile in terms of ecosystem support.

  5. Monitoring and Logging: Kubernetes offers robust monitoring and logging capabilities through its built-in tools like Prometheus and Fluentd. These tools provide real-time visibility into cluster performance and help in troubleshooting issues. While Blox may support monitoring and logging through custom implementations, it may not have the same level of sophistication and integration as Kubernetes.

  6. Cost Considerations: In terms of cost, Blox may be a more cost-effective option for smaller deployments or organizations looking for a simple container management solution. Kubernetes, with its more extensive feature set and capabilities, may come with higher operational costs, especially for larger deployments that require advanced functionalities.

In Summary, Blox and Kubernetes differ in their architecture, scalability, community support, ecosystem integration, monitoring capabilities, and cost considerations, making each option suitable for specific use cases based on the requirements and preferences of the users.

Decisions about Blox and Kubernetes
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 8.9M views

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

  • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
  • Respectively Git as revision control system
  • SourceTree as Git GUI
  • Visual Studio Code as IDE
  • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
  • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
  • SonarQube as quality gate
  • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
  • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
  • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
  • Heroku for deploying in test environments
  • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
  • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
  • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
  • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
  • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

  • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
  • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
  • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
  • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
  • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
  • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Blox
Pros of Kubernetes
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 164
      Leading docker container management solution
    • 128
      Simple and powerful
    • 106
      Open source
    • 76
      Backed by google
    • 58
      The right abstractions
    • 25
      Scale services
    • 20
      Replication controller
    • 11
      Permission managment
    • 9
      Supports autoscaling
    • 8
      Cheap
    • 8
      Simple
    • 6
      Self-healing
    • 5
      No cloud platform lock-in
    • 5
      Promotes modern/good infrascture practice
    • 5
      Open, powerful, stable
    • 5
      Reliable
    • 4
      Scalable
    • 4
      Quick cloud setup
    • 3
      Cloud Agnostic
    • 3
      Captain of Container Ship
    • 3
      A self healing environment with rich metadata
    • 3
      Runs on azure
    • 3
      Backed by Red Hat
    • 3
      Custom and extensibility
    • 2
      Sfg
    • 2
      Gke
    • 2
      Everything of CaaS
    • 2
      Golang
    • 2
      Easy setup
    • 2
      Expandable

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Blox
    Cons of Kubernetes
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 16
        Steep learning curve
      • 15
        Poor workflow for development
      • 8
        Orchestrates only infrastructure
      • 4
        High resource requirements for on-prem clusters
      • 2
        Too heavy for simple systems
      • 1
        Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)
      • 1
        More moving parts to secure
      • 1
        Additional Technology Overhead

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Blox?

      Blox is a collection of open source projects for container management and orchestration. Blox gives you more control over how your containerized applications run on Amazon ECS. It enables you to build schedulers and integrate third-party schedulers on top of ECS, while leveraging Amazon ECS to fully manage and scale your clusters.

      What is Kubernetes?

      Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Blox?
      What companies use Kubernetes?
        No companies found
        See which teams inside your own company are using Blox or Kubernetes.
        Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Blox?
        What tools integrate with Kubernetes?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        Blog Posts

        Kubernetesetcd+2
        2
        1154
        Dec 8 2020 at 5:50PM

        DigitalOcean

        GitHubMySQLPostgreSQL+11
        2
        2352
        PythonDockerKubernetes+7
        3
        1096
        May 21 2020 at 12:02AM

        Rancher Labs

        KubernetesAmazon EC2Grafana+12
        5
        1488
        Apr 16 2020 at 5:34AM

        Rancher Labs

        KubernetesRancher+2
        2
        929
        What are some alternatives to Blox and Kubernetes?
        AWS Amplify
        A JavaScript library for frontend and mobile developers building cloud-enabled applications. The library is a declarative interface across different categories of operations in order to make common tasks easier to add into your application. The default implementation works with Amazon Web Services (AWS) resources but is designed to be open and pluggable for usage with other cloud services that wish to provide an implementation or custom backends.
        AWS CLI
        It is a unified tool to manage your AWS services. With just one tool to download and configure, you can control multiple AWS services from the command line and automate them through scripts.
        LocalStack
        LocalStack provides an easy-to-use test/mocking framework for developing Cloud applications.
        Bash-My-AWS
        It is a simple but extremely powerful set of CLI commands for managing resources on Amazon Web Services. They harness the power of Amazon's AWSCLI, while abstracting away verbosity. The project implements some innovative patterns but (arguably) remains simple, beautiful and readable.
        AWS Shell
        The AWS Command Line Interface is a unified tool to manage your AWS services.
        See all alternatives