StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Blade vs Symfony

Blade vs Symfony

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Symfony
Symfony
Stacks8.5K
Followers6.2K
Votes1.1K
GitHub Stars30.7K
Forks9.7K
Blade
Blade
Stacks50
Followers83
Votes0

Blade vs Symfony: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Blade and Symfony. Both Blade and Symfony are popular templating engines used in web development, but they have some important distinctions that set them apart.

  1. Syntax and Features: Blade is a part of the Laravel framework and offers a simple, expressive syntax allowing for easy development and maintenance of views. It provides features like template inheritance, loops, and conditional statements. On the other hand, Symfony uses Twig as its default templating engine, offering a more strict and controlled syntax, with a focus on security and preventing code injection.

  2. Integration with Frameworks: Blade is tightly integrated with the Laravel framework, making it the default templating engine for Laravel applications. This integration allows for seamless usage of Laravel-specific features, such as routing and model binding. Symfony, on the other hand, is a standalone framework and can be used with any framework or application. It provides a high level of flexibility and customization options.

  3. Performance and Caching: Blade is known for its fast performance due to its simple syntax and efficient rendering process. It has built-in caching mechanisms that can help improve the performance of web applications. Symfony, on the other hand, uses Twig, which also has good performance but focuses more on the security and robustness aspects of template rendering.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Laravel, the framework that uses Blade, has a large and active community, with numerous packages and resources available. This makes it easier to find help and support when working with Blade. Symfony also has a strong community and ecosystem, with its own set of packages and resources, but it may not be as extensive as the Laravel ecosystem.

  5. Learning Curve: Blade's simple and intuitive syntax makes it relatively easy to learn and use, especially for developers who are already familiar with PHP. It has a shallow learning curve, allowing developers to quickly start building views. Symfony, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its more advanced features and complexity. It may require more time and effort to become proficient in using Symfony's templating engine.

  6. Framework Dependencies: Blade is tightly coupled with Laravel and relies on its underlying features and components. This means that using Blade outside of the Laravel framework may require additional configuration or workarounds. Symfony, on the other hand, is designed to be more framework-agnostic and can be easily integrated with different frameworks and libraries.

In Summary, Blade offers a simple syntax and easy integration with Laravel, while Symfony provides a more strict syntax and is more flexible in terms of framework usage. Laravel has a larger community and ecosystem, while Symfony offers better security and robustness in template rendering. Blade has a shallower learning curve, while Symfony may require more time to master.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Symfony, Blade

Fabian
Fabian

May 5, 2020

Needs adviceonGraphQLGraphQLC++C++SymfonySymfony

I'm about to begin working on an API, for which I plan to add GraphQL connectivity for processing data. The data processed will mainly be audio files being downloaded/uploaded with some user messaging & authentication.

I don't mind the difficulty in any service since I've used C++ (for data structures & algorithms at least) and would also say I am patient and can learn fairly quickly. My main concerns would be their performance, libraries/community, and job marketability.

Why I'm stuck between these three...

Symfony: I've programmed in PHP for back-end in a previous internship and may do so again in a few months.

Node.js: It's newer than PHP, and it's JavaScript where my front-end stack will be React and (likely) React Native.

Golang: It's newer than PHP, I've heard of its good performance, and it would be nice to learn a new (growing) language.

2.4M views2.4M
Comments
Filippo
Filippo

Aug 27, 2020

Review

In my humble opinion the best available php platform is "API Platform". I have tried a lot of backend frameworks in the last 10 years, and that is one of the best, at least in the PHP ecosystem. It's based on Symfony, it supports plenty of features like Swagger docs, Rest API, GraphQL. You can plugin React Admin to have a full admin in no time. But the best part in my opinion it's how you can easily extend the backend taking advantage of the ORM Doctrine (which is one of the most mature available across all technologies) and all the plugins of Symfony. The fact that the Doctrine entities are in automatic relation and they can be exposed as GraphQL it's a big win if you have a complex database. It is also possible to reverse engineering an existing database and create automatically all the entities, admin, restapi, graphql endpoints ... welcome to the future :)

50 views50
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Symfony
Symfony
Blade
Blade

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

It is a pursuit of simple, efficient Web framework, so that JavaWeb development becomes even more powerful, both in performance and flexibility.

-
Lightweight; Modular; Supports plug-in extensions; Restful style routing; Embedded jetty server and template engine support; Supports JDK 1.6 and up
Statistics
GitHub Stars
30.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
8.5K
Stacks
50
Followers
6.2K
Followers
83
Votes
1.1K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Open source
  • 149
    Php
  • 130
    Community
  • 129
    Dependency injection
  • 122
    Professional
Cons
  • 10
    Too many dependency
  • 8
    Lot of config files
  • 4
    YMAL
  • 3
    Feature creep
  • 1
    Bloated
No community feedback yet
Integrations
CakePHP
CakePHP
PHP
PHP
ReactPHP
ReactPHP
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Symfony, Blade?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase