StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Blade vs Pug

Blade vs Pug

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pug
Pug
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.2K
Votes467
Blade
Blade
Stacks50
Followers83
Votes0

Blade vs Pug: What are the differences?

Introduction

Blade and Pug are both popular template engines used in web development, but they differ in several key aspects. Below are the six main differences between Blade and Pug.

  1. Syntax: Blade uses PHP-like syntax, allowing developers to embed PHP code directly within the templates using @php tags. On the other hand, Pug uses indentation-based syntax, similar to Python, making it more concise and easier to read.

  2. Whitespace handling: Blade preserves whitespace, allowing developers to have precise control over the output HTML. In Pug, however, whitespace is significant, and indentation determines the hierarchy of elements in the generated HTML.

  3. Code organization: Blade templates are organized into separate files with a .blade.php extension, allowing for reusable components and inheritance capabilities. Pug, on the other hand, uses a single file with a .pug extension, making it suitable for small to medium-sized projects with less code complexity.

  4. Conditional statements: Blade provides a familiar syntax for conditional statements, using @if, @else, and @endif directives. Pug, on the other hand, uses indentation to define conditional blocks and doesn't require explicit control structures.

  5. Looping constructs: Blade utilizes @foreach, @for, and @while directives to define loops within templates. Pug, on the other hand, relies on indentation to determine the scope of loops and doesn't provide explicit loop constructs.

  6. Integration with frameworks: Blade is the default template engine of the Laravel framework, providing seamless integration and a rich set of features out of the box. Pug, on the other hand, is not as widely supported within popular frameworks and requires additional configuration to work with them.

In summary, Blade is a PHP-based template engine with a familiar syntax and a strong integration with Laravel, while Pug is an indentation-based template engine with concise syntax but limited framework support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pug
Pug
Blade
Blade

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

It is a pursuit of simple, efficient Web framework, so that JavaWeb development becomes even more powerful, both in performance and flexibility.

-
Lightweight; Modular; Supports plug-in extensions; Restful style routing; Embedded jetty server and template engine support; Supports JDK 1.6 and up
Statistics
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
50
Followers
1.2K
Followers
83
Votes
467
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 138
    Elegant html
  • 90
    Great with nodejs
  • 59
    Very short syntax
  • 59
    Open source
  • 54
    Structured with indentation
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Pug, Blade?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase