StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Bitbucket vs Upsource

Bitbucket vs Upsource

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Stacks41.1K
Followers33.4K
Votes2.8K
Upsource
Upsource
Stacks51
Followers77
Votes58

Bitbucket vs Upsource: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Bitbucket and Upsource

<Write Introduction here>

1. **IDE Integration**: Bitbucket offers IDE integrations for popular tools like Visual Studio, Atom, and Eclipse, making it easier for developers to work seamlessly within their preferred environment. On the other hand, Upsource provides integration with IntelliJ IDEA only, limiting the options for developers using different IDEs.
2. **Code Review Capabilities**: Bitbucket provides basic code review capabilities that allow for comments and suggestions on code changes. In contrast, Upsource offers more advanced code review features like code intelligence, duplicate code detection, and code inspections to improve code quality and collaboration among team members.
3. **Scalability**: Bitbucket is more suitable for small to medium-sized teams due to its pricing model based on the number of users. In comparison, Upsource is better suited for larger enterprise teams as it offers more robust collaboration and code review features that scale well with growing team sizes.
4. **Version Control System Support**: Bitbucket supports Git and Mercurial for version control, providing flexibility for teams using different systems. Upsource, on the other hand, supports Git repositories only, limiting the options for teams working with Mercurial or other version control systems.
5. **Advanced Search Functionality**: Upsource offers advanced search functionality that allows users to quickly find code snippets, commits, and reviews within the codebase. Bitbucket, on the other hand, has more basic search capabilities, which may be sufficient for smaller teams but lack the robustness required for larger projects.
6. **Integration with Issue Tracking Tools**: Bitbucket integrates seamlessly with JIRA, allowing for better tracking and management of issues related to code changes. While Upsource also offers integration with JIRA, Bitbucket's integration is more seamless and offers a more cohesive workflow between code development and issue tracking.

In Summary, Bitbucket is more suitable for small to medium-sized teams, while Upsource offers more advanced code review features and scalability options for larger enterprise teams.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Upsource

Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M
Comments
Eduardo
Eduardo

Software Engineer at Parrot Software, Inc.

Aug 24, 2021

Decided

Do you have a K8s cluster and you want to deploy some services to it? Gitlab Auto Devops is key to achieve this without breaking a sweat.

We deploy Go services to our K8S clusters with warp speed thanks to Gitlab and it's Auto Devops pipeline.

I haven't seen tooling like this in any other git cloud provider.

292k views292k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Upsource
Upsource

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial
Instantly access all your projects;Keep track of code changes;Use code insight in Java projects;Explore any revision of your code base;Discuss and review code;Share links to code
Statistics
Stacks
41.1K
Stacks
51
Followers
33.4K
Followers
77
Votes
2.8K
Votes
58
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 905
    Free private repos
  • 397
    Simple setup
  • 349
    Nice ui and tools
  • 342
    Unlimited private repositories
  • 240
    Affordable git hosting
Cons
  • 19
    Not much community activity
  • 17
    Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui
  • 15
    Quite buggy
  • 10
    Managed by enterprise Java company
  • 8
    CI tool is not free of charge
Pros
  • 15
    Free for 10 users
  • 12
    Good code review
  • 8
    Java code inspections and navigation
  • 8
    IDE integration
  • 3
    Has a linux version
Cons
  • 3
    Very Large Server Footprint. Very large
Integrations
Git
Git
AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
Sentry
Sentry
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
npm
npm
Trello
Trello
Slack
Slack
Confluence
Confluence
Docker
Docker
Jira
Jira
GitHub
GitHub
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Perforce
Perforce

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Upsource?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana