Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Bitbucket vs SVN (Subversion): What are the differences?
Bitbucket and SVN (Subversion) are version control systems used to manage source code and track changes in software development projects. Let's explore the key differences between them.
Version Control System: Bitbucket is a distributed version control system (DVCS) that allows developers to work both offline and online, making it easier to collaborate with teams. On the other hand, SVN is a centralized version control system (CVCS) that requires a centralized server for project collaboration.
Branching and Merging: Bitbucket provides a more streamlined and efficient branching and merging process. It allows developers to create lightweight branches, easily switch between branches, and merge changes with minimal conflicts. In contrast, SVN has a more complex and time-consuming branching and merging process, often leading to conflicts and difficulties in tracking changes.
Code Access and Collaboration: Bitbucket offers access controls for both individual users and teams, enabling fine-grained permission settings to control who can view, edit, and approve code. It also provides features like pull requests and code review, facilitating collaboration within the development team. SVN, on the other hand, has fewer options for code access control and lacks collaboration features, making it less suitable for large-scale projects with distributed teams.
Support for Large Files: Bitbucket has built-in support for large file storage, allowing developers to manage and version large binary files seamlessly. SVN, on the other hand, does not natively handle large files efficiently, which can lead to challenges in team collaboration, especially when dealing with multimedia files or complex design assets.
Integration and Ecosystem: Bitbucket has a comprehensive ecosystem and seamless integration with various development tools, including CI/CD platforms like Jenkins and popular project management tools like Jira. It provides built-in integrations for a smoother development workflow. On the contrary, SVN has limited ecosystem support and integration options, which can hinder the overall productivity and efficiency of the development process.
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Bitbucket offers a user-friendly interface and intuitive commands, making it easier for developers to learn and adapt. It provides a smoother onboarding experience for new team members. In contrast, SVN has a steeper learning curve, as it requires familiarity with command-line operations and an understanding of its unique terminology.
In summary, Bitbucket provides a more modern, distributed, and user-friendly approach to version control, with efficient branching, collaboration features, and integrations, while SVN is a centralized system with a steeper learning curve, fewer collaboration capabilities, and limited ecosystem support.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i
is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Pros of Bitbucket
- Free private repos904
- Simple setup397
- Nice ui and tools348
- Unlimited private repositories341
- Affordable git hosting240
- Integrates with many apis and services123
- Reliable uptime119
- Nice gui87
- Pull requests and code reviews85
- Very customisable58
- Mercurial repositories16
- SourceTree integration14
- JIRA integration12
- Track every commit to an issue in JIRA10
- Deployment hooks8
- Best free alternative to Github8
- Automatically share repositories with all your teammates7
- Compatible with Mac and Windows7
- Source Code Insight6
- Price6
- Login with Google5
- Create a wiki5
- Approve pull request button5
- Customizable pipelines4
- #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA4
- Also supports Mercurial3
- Unlimited Private Repos at no cost3
- Continuous Integration and Delivery3
- Academic license program2
- Multilingual interface2
- Teamcity2
- Open source friendly2
- Issues tracker2
- IAM2
- IAM integration2
- Mercurial Support2
Pros of SVN (Subversion)
- Easy to use20
- Simple code versioning13
- User/Access Management5
- Complicated code versionioning by Subversion3
- Free2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Bitbucket
- Not much community activity19
- Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui17
- Quite buggy15
- Managed by enterprise Java company10
- CI tool is not free of charge8
- Complexity with rights management7
- Only 5 collaborators for private repos6
- Slow performance4
- No AWS Codepipelines integration2
- No more Mercurial repositories1
- No server side git-hook support1
Cons of SVN (Subversion)
- Branching and tagging use tons of disk space7