Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.4K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

SourceTree

Stacks10.7K

Followers8.1K

Votes727

Bitbucket vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Bitbucket and SourceTree, focusing on their key differences.

Integration and Hosting: Bitbucket is a web-based hosting service that allows users to host private or public repositories, while SourceTree is a client application for managing and interacting with Git and Mercurial repositories. Bitbucket provides seamless integration with other Atlassian products like Jira, Confluence, and Trello, enhancing project management capabilities. On the other hand, SourceTree integrates with various Git hosting platforms, making it suitable for developers working with multiple repositories.
User Interface: Bitbucket has a user-friendly and intuitive web interface, allowing users to navigate repositories, manage pull requests, and view code diffs efficiently. SourceTree, being a desktop application, provides a visually appealing interface with a wide range of features for managing repositories, including git flow, repository bookmarking, and a visual diff viewer.
Collaboration Features: Bitbucket offers a robust set of collaboration features, such as pull requests, code reviews, and inline commenting, enabling seamless collaboration between developers. SourceTree, on the other hand, offers limited collaboration features as it primarily focuses on managing and interacting with repositories at an individual developer level.
Version Control Support: Bitbucket supports both Git and Mercurial version control systems, providing flexibility to developers depending on their preferred system. SourceTree supports multiple version control systems, including Git and Mercurial, allowing users to work with repositories using different systems in a single application.
Platform Availability: Bitbucket is a web-based service accessible from any modern web browser, making it platform-independent. SourceTree, although primarily developed for macOS, is also available for Windows users, allowing developers to use the same client application on different operating systems.
Advanced Features: Bitbucket offers advanced features like code search, built-in continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD), and project management capabilities, providing a comprehensive solution for development teams. While SourceTree offers advanced features like the ability to create and manage Git flow branches, stash changes, and interactive rebasing, enhancing the version control workflow for individual developers.

In summary, Bitbucket is a web-based hosting service with seamless integration, robust collaboration features, and advanced project management capabilities. SourceTree, being a client application, provides a visually appealing interface, support for multiple version control systems, and advanced features for individual developers.

Advice on Bitbucket, SourceTree

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.18M views1.18M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Stefan

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows * to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie) * it helps to investigate the history * most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	SourceTree
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Full-powered DVCS;Create, clone, commit, push, pull, merge, and more are all just a click away.;Review your outgoing and incoming changesets, cherry-pick between branches, patch handling, rebase, stash, shelve, and much more.;Use Git-flow and Hg-flow with ease. Keep your repositories cleaner and your development more efficient with SourceTree's intuitive interface to Git and Hg's 'branchy' development model.
Statistics
Stacks 41.4K	Stacks 10.7K
Followers 33.4K	Followers 8.1K
Votes 2.8K	Votes 727
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 205 Visual history and branch view 164 Beautiful UI 134 Easy repository browsing 87 Gitflow support 75 Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines Cons 12 Crashes often 8 So many bugs 7 Fetching is slow sometimes 5 Extremely slow 5 Very unstable
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	GitHub Git Windows macOS Mercurial

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, SourceTree?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.