Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Bitbucket vs Plastic SCM: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Bitbucket and Plastic SCM
Bitbucket and Plastic SCM are both popular version control systems used in software development. However, they have several key differences that distinguish them from each other.
Hosting Options: Bitbucket is primarily a cloud-based solution that provides both Git and Mercurial repositories. On the other hand, Plastic SCM offers both cloud-based and self-hosted options and uses its proprietary version control system.
Workflow Support: Bitbucket focuses on providing support for Git workflows, such as branching and merging, and offers a user-friendly interface for managing these workflows. In contrast, Plastic SCM offers a more flexible workflow management system that allows for more complex branching strategies and supports branching and merging across different repository types.
Branch Visualization: Bitbucket provides basic visualization tools for exploring branches and their relationships, allowing developers to understand the history of their code. Plastic SCM, on the other hand, offers more advanced and customizable branch visualization capabilities, enabling developers to visualize the entire development process in a more comprehensive and intuitive way.
Collaboration and Code Review: Bitbucket offers built-in collaboration features, including code review functionality that allows team members to review, comment, and discuss changes made to the codebase. Plastic SCM also provides collaboration features, but they are not as integrated or extensive as those in Bitbucket.
Integration and Extensibility: Bitbucket has a wide range of integrations with other development tools and services, allowing developers to streamline their workflows and enhance productivity. Plastic SCM also provides integration options, but they may be more limited compared to Bitbucket.
Pricing: Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans, with different feature sets and limitations based on the pricing tier. Plastic SCM, on the other hand, is a commercial product with a paid licensing model, which may be more suitable for larger teams or organizations with specific requirements.
In summary, Bitbucket is a cloud-based version control system with a focus on Git workflows and user-friendly collaboration features, while Plastic SCM offers a more flexible workflow management system, advanced branch visualization capabilities, and both cloud-based and self-hosted hosting options.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Pros of Bitbucket
- Free private repos904
- Simple setup397
- Nice ui and tools348
- Unlimited private repositories341
- Affordable git hosting240
- Integrates with many apis and services123
- Reliable uptime119
- Nice gui87
- Pull requests and code reviews85
- Very customisable58
- Mercurial repositories16
- SourceTree integration14
- JIRA integration12
- Track every commit to an issue in JIRA10
- Deployment hooks8
- Best free alternative to Github8
- Automatically share repositories with all your teammates7
- Compatible with Mac and Windows7
- Source Code Insight6
- Price6
- Login with Google5
- Create a wiki5
- Approve pull request button5
- Customizable pipelines4
- #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA4
- Also supports Mercurial3
- Unlimited Private Repos at no cost3
- Continuous Integration and Delivery3
- Academic license program2
- Multilingual interface2
- Teamcity2
- Open source friendly2
- Issues tracker2
- IAM2
- IAM integration2
- Mercurial Support2
Pros of Plastic SCM
- Wanna do Branch per Task Dev? Plastic rocks it8
- No Size limite4
- File Locking2
- Simple, easy to use interfaces. Resilient and solid2
- Very fast1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Bitbucket
- Not much community activity19
- Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui17
- Quite buggy15
- Managed by enterprise Java company10
- CI tool is not free of charge8
- Complexity with rights management7
- Only 5 collaborators for private repos6
- Slow performance4
- No AWS Codepipelines integration2
- No more Mercurial repositories1
- No server side git-hook support1
Cons of Plastic SCM
- Always uses automatic conflict resolution first1
- Adds files with only changed timestamp to pending1
- Keyboard shortcuts are lacking1
- Can't place windows next to each other to save space1
- No dark theme1
- Doesn't have file staging1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Bitbucket?
What is Plastic SCM?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Plastic SCM?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+4
+32+34