StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Bitbucket vs Octopus Deploy

Bitbucket vs Octopus Deploy

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Stacks41.1K
Followers33.4K
Votes2.8K
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
Stacks407
Followers493
Votes118

Bitbucket vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?

Key differences between Bitbucket and Octopus Deploy

Bitbucket and Octopus Deploy are two popular tools used in the software development and deployment process. While both offer features to support the development lifecycle, there are significant differences between the two. Here are the key differences:

  1. Hosting and Version Control: Bitbucket is primarily a Git-based hosting platform that provides version control functionality. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy is a deployment automation tool that integrates with various version control systems like Git, Mercurial, and Subversion. Bitbucket offers a complete version control solution, while Octopus Deploy focuses on automating the application deployment process.

  2. Code Review and Collaboration: Bitbucket puts a strong emphasis on code collaboration and offers features like pull requests, code reviews, and inline commenting. It provides a collaborative environment for developers to evaluate and improve code quality. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, is not designed specifically for code review and collaboration. Its main focus is on automating the deployment process.

  3. Continuous Integration and Build Pipelines: Bitbucket provides built-in integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, and Bitbucket Pipelines. It allows developers to define and manage build pipelines, automate tests, and deploy applications. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, is a complete deployment automation solution that integrates with CI/CD tools like TeamCity, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps. It offers sophisticated release management capabilities to orchestrate deployments across multiple environments.

  4. Deployment Targets and Environments: Octopus Deploy allows you to define and manage deployment targets, such as servers, cloud services, and containers. It provides fine-grained control over deploying applications to different environments, like development, staging, and production. Bitbucket, on the other hand, is not primarily designed for managing deployment targets and environments. Its focus is on version control and code collaboration.

  5. Release Management and Versioning: Octopus Deploy has robust release management capabilities, allowing you to create, version, and deploy releases with ease. It supports versioning strategies, release notes, and rollbacks. Bitbucket, on the other hand, does not provide the same level of release management functionality. It focuses on managing code changes and collaboration.

  6. Extensibility and Integrations: Octopus Deploy offers a variety of integrations with third-party tools and platforms, allowing you to extend its functionality as per your requirements. It integrates with various DevOps tools, cloud platforms, and infrastructure providers. Bitbucket also provides integrations with other tools, but its extensibility options are relatively limited compared to Octopus Deploy.

In summary, Bitbucket is a Git-based hosting platform with a strong focus on version control and code collaboration, while Octopus Deploy is a deployment automation tool specializing in orchestrating deployments across different environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Octopus Deploy

Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M
Comments
Elmar
Elmar

CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media

Nov 9, 2020

Decided

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

586k views586k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial
Deploy on-premises or to the cloud, securely;.NET, Java, PHP, Node, Ruby;Full API support;Approvals and manual intervention;Enable self-service deployments;Installs in minutes;Integrates with your build server;Free for small teams
Statistics
Stacks
41.1K
Stacks
407
Followers
33.4K
Followers
493
Votes
2.8K
Votes
118
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 905
    Free private repos
  • 397
    Simple setup
  • 349
    Nice ui and tools
  • 342
    Unlimited private repositories
  • 240
    Affordable git hosting
Cons
  • 19
    Not much community activity
  • 17
    Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui
  • 15
    Quite buggy
  • 10
    Managed by enterprise Java company
  • 8
    CI tool is not free of charge
Pros
  • 30
    Powerful
  • 25
    Simplicity
  • 20
    Easy to learn
  • 17
    .Net oriented
  • 14
    Easy to manage releases and rollback
Cons
  • 4
    Poor UI
  • 2
    Management of Config
  • 2
    Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git)
Integrations
Git
Git
AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
Sentry
Sentry
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
npm
npm
Trello
Trello
Slack
Slack
Confluence
Confluence
Docker
Docker
Jira
Jira
Jenkins
Jenkins
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
TeamCity
TeamCity
Jira
Jira
Appveyor
Appveyor
Bamboo
Bamboo

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Octopus Deploy?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana