Bitbucket vs Laravel Forge

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Laravel Forge

Stacks232

Followers273

Votes4

Bitbucket vs Laravel Forge: What are the differences?

Introduction: Here are some key differences between Bitbucket and Laravel Forge.

Hosting vs. Deployment: Bitbucket is primarily a code hosting platform that allows developers to manage and collaborate on code repositories, while Laravel Forge is a deployment tool specifically designed for deploying Laravel applications to servers. Bitbucket focuses on version control, code review, and project management, whereas Laravel Forge simplifies the process of setting up and managing servers for Laravel applications.
Version Control vs. Server Management: Bitbucket provides a version control system using Git or Mercurial, enabling teams to track changes in code, manage branches, and collaborate on projects. On the other hand, Laravel Forge focuses on server management, automating tasks like server provisioning, SSL certificate installation, and deployment of Laravel applications.
Free vs. Paid: Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans, with limitations on the number of users, repositories, and build minutes. Laravel Forge, on the other hand, is a paid service with a monthly subscription fee. While Bitbucket can be used for free for small teams or personal projects, Laravel Forge caters more towards professional developers and teams looking for streamlined server management solutions.
Integration Capabilities: Bitbucket integrates with various tools and services such as Jira, Trello, and Bamboo for enhanced project management and continuous integration. Laravel Forge integrates with services like DigitalOcean, Amazon Web Services, and Linode for server provisioning and deployment, providing a seamless workflow for Laravel developers.
Code Review vs. Automated Deployment: In Bitbucket, code review is an essential feature that allows team members to collaborate on code changes, provide feedback, and ensure code quality through pull requests and inline comments. Laravel Forge, on the other hand, focuses on automated deployment processes, enabling developers to deploy code changes to servers with ease, reducing downtime and ensuring scalability.
Community Support vs. Official Support: Bitbucket has a large community of users and contributors offering support, documentation, and resources for developers using the platform. Laravel Forge, being a paid service, provides official support and documentation directly from the Laravel team, ensuring reliability and timely assistance for users.

In Summary, Bitbucket is a code hosting platform focused on version control and collaboration, while Laravel Forge is a deployment tool specifically designed for managing servers and deploying Laravel applications efficiently.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Laravel Forge

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Laravel Forge
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	Provision, host, and deploy PHP applications on AWS, DigitalOcean, and Linode.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	-
Statistics
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 232
Followers 33.4K	Followers 273
Votes 2.8K	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 4 Simply to use Cons 2 Monthly subscription
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Laravel Forge?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs Laravel Forge: What are the differences?

Introduction: Here are some key differences between Bitbucket and Laravel Forge.

Hosting vs. Deployment: Bitbucket is primarily a code hosting platform that allows developers to manage and collaborate on code repositories, while Laravel Forge is a deployment tool specifically designed for deploying Laravel applications to servers. Bitbucket focuses on version control, code review, and project management, whereas Laravel Forge simplifies the process of setting up and managing servers for Laravel applications.
Version Control vs. Server Management: Bitbucket provides a version control system using Git or Mercurial, enabling teams to track changes in code, manage branches, and collaborate on projects. On the other hand, Laravel Forge focuses on server management, automating tasks like server provisioning, SSL certificate installation, and deployment of Laravel applications.
Free vs. Paid: Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans, with limitations on the number of users, repositories, and build minutes. Laravel Forge, on the other hand, is a paid service with a monthly subscription fee. While Bitbucket can be used for free for small teams or personal projects, Laravel Forge caters more towards professional developers and teams looking for streamlined server management solutions.
Integration Capabilities: Bitbucket integrates with various tools and services such as Jira, Trello, and Bamboo for enhanced project management and continuous integration. Laravel Forge integrates with services like DigitalOcean, Amazon Web Services, and Linode for server provisioning and deployment, providing a seamless workflow for Laravel developers.
Code Review vs. Automated Deployment: In Bitbucket, code review is an essential feature that allows team members to collaborate on code changes, provide feedback, and ensure code quality through pull requests and inline comments. Laravel Forge, on the other hand, focuses on automated deployment processes, enabling developers to deploy code changes to servers with ease, reducing downtime and ensuring scalability.
Community Support vs. Official Support: Bitbucket has a large community of users and contributors offering support, documentation, and resources for developers using the platform. Laravel Forge, being a paid service, provides official support and documentation directly from the Laravel team, ensuring reliability and timely assistance for users.

Bitbucket vs Laravel Forge

Overview