Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Bitbucket vs Google Cloud Source Repositories: What are the differences?
Introduction: Below are the key differences between Bitbucket and Google Cloud Source Repositories.
Version control system: Bitbucket supports Git as the version control system, whereas Google Cloud Source Repositories supports both Git and Mercurial. This difference gives users the flexibility to choose the version control system that best fits their needs.
Integration with other tools: Bitbucket has seamless integrations with popular tools like JIRA and Trello, making it easier for development teams to manage their projects. On the other hand, Google Cloud Source Repositories offers integration with Google Cloud Platform tools, providing a cohesive environment for cloud-based development.
Access control and permissions: Bitbucket allows users to set granular access controls and permissions at the repository level, allowing for more precise control over who can view or modify code. Google Cloud Source Repositories integrates with Google Cloud IAM, enabling users to manage access control through IAM roles, which is advantageous for organizations already using Google Cloud Platform.
Storage limit: Bitbucket offers unlimited private repositories for free accounts, with a fair usage policy, providing ample storage for small to medium-sized projects. Google Cloud Source Repositories, on the other hand, has a limit on the size of the repositories, which can be a factor for larger projects with extensive codebases.
Continuous integration and deployment: Bitbucket supports integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, allowing for seamless automation of build and deployment processes. Google Cloud Source Repositories has built-in integrations with Cloud Build, enabling users to set up automated build triggers easily within the Google Cloud Platform ecosystem.
In Summary, Bitbucket and Google Cloud Source Repositories differ in terms of supported version control systems, integrations with other tools, access control mechanisms, storage limits, and built-in support for continuous integration and deployment tools.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Pros of Bitbucket
- Free private repos904
- Simple setup397
- Nice ui and tools348
- Unlimited private repositories341
- Affordable git hosting240
- Integrates with many apis and services123
- Reliable uptime119
- Nice gui87
- Pull requests and code reviews85
- Very customisable58
- Mercurial repositories16
- SourceTree integration14
- JIRA integration12
- Track every commit to an issue in JIRA10
- Deployment hooks8
- Best free alternative to Github8
- Automatically share repositories with all your teammates7
- Compatible with Mac and Windows7
- Source Code Insight6
- Price6
- Login with Google5
- Create a wiki5
- Approve pull request button5
- Customizable pipelines4
- #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA4
- Also supports Mercurial3
- Unlimited Private Repos at no cost3
- Continuous Integration and Delivery3
- Academic license program2
- Multilingual interface2
- Teamcity2
- Open source friendly2
- Issues tracker2
- IAM2
- IAM integration2
- Mercurial Support2
Pros of Google Cloud Source Repositories
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Bitbucket
- Not much community activity19
- Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui17
- Quite buggy15
- Managed by enterprise Java company10
- CI tool is not free of charge8
- Complexity with rights management7
- Only 5 collaborators for private repos6
- Slow performance4
- No AWS Codepipelines integration2
- No more Mercurial repositories1
- No server side git-hook support1
Cons of Google Cloud Source Repositories
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Bitbucket?
What is Google Cloud Source Repositories?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Google Cloud Source Repositories?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Google Cloud Source Repositories?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+4
+32+34