StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Beego vs Revel

Beego vs Revel

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Revel
Revel
Stacks36
Followers100
Votes38
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks1.4K
Beego
Beego
Stacks52
Followers98
Votes0
GitHub Stars744
Forks183

Beego vs Revel: What are the differences?

Introduction

When considering web frameworks in Go language, Beego and Revel are two popular choices. Both frameworks have their strengths and limitations, catering to different needs and preferences of developers. Below are key differences between Beego and Revel.

  1. Architecture Design: Beego follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) pattern, providing a structured way to develop web applications by separating the application into models, views, and controllers. On the other hand, Revel implements a different design called the Model-View-Controller-Template (MVCT) pattern, which includes an extra layer called the template layer for handling the rendering of views.

  2. Performance and Speed: Beego is known for its speed and performance, as it is lightweight and efficient, making it a suitable choice for building high-performance web applications. Revel, on the other hand, sacrifices a bit of performance for its high-level features and ease of use, making it more suitable for rapid development or prototyping.

  3. Code Generation: Beego provides built-in tools for code generation, such as bee tool, which helps in tasks like scaffolding controllers, models, and CRUD operations. On the contrary, Revel does not have a built-in code generation tool, which might require developers to write more code manually, leading to a longer development time.

  4. Dependency Management: Beego has integrated support for Go modules, making it easier to manage dependencies and handle third-party packages efficiently. In contrast, Revel relies on the traditional GOPATH system for dependency management, which can be less intuitive and cumbersome when dealing with multiple dependencies.

  5. Flexibility and Extensibility: Beego allows developers to have more flexibility in choosing different components or libraries for their applications, as it does not enforce strict conventions. Revel, on the other hand, follows strict conventions and has limited extensibility options, which may restrict developers in certain scenarios.

  6. Learning Curve and Documentation: Beego has a steeper learning curve compared to Revel, especially for beginners, due to its flexibility and the need to make decisions on various aspects of the application structure. Revel, with its opinionated design and comprehensive documentation, offers a more beginner-friendly experience, making it easier to get started with building web applications.

In Summary, Beego and Revel differ in architecture design, performance, code generation, dependency management, flexibility, and learning curve, providing developers with distinct options for building web applications in Go.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Revel
Revel
Beego
Beego

Revel makes it easy to build web applications using the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern by relying on conventions that require a certain structure in your application. In return, it is very light on configuration and enables an extremely fast development cycle.

It is a RESTful HTTP framework for the rapid development of Go applications including APIs, web apps and backend services with integrated Go specific features such as interfaces and struct embedding.

-
Interfaces; Struct embedding; Rapid Development
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Stars
744
GitHub Forks
1.4K
GitHub Forks
183
Stacks
36
Stacks
52
Followers
100
Followers
98
Votes
38
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 16
    Go
  • 6
    High-Productivity
  • 5
    Full-Stack
  • 4
    High performance
  • 4
    MVC
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Golang
Golang
Golang
Golang
Sentry
Sentry
Laravel
Laravel
Stream
Stream
Python
Python
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
KeyCDN
KeyCDN

What are some alternatives to Revel, Beego?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase