StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Beego vs Geddy

Beego vs Geddy

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Geddy
Geddy
Stacks6
Followers23
Votes3
GitHub Stars1.9K
Forks234
Beego
Beego
Stacks52
Followers98
Votes0
GitHub Stars744
Forks183

Beego vs Geddy: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown, we will discuss the key differences between Beego and Geddy.

  1. Architecture: Beego follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, providing clear separation of concerns. On the other hand, Geddy follows a different architecture called HMVC (Hierarchical Model-View-Controller), which allows for more modular and reusable components within the framework.

  2. Community Support: Beego has a larger and more active community compared to Geddy. This means that Beego users have access to more resources, libraries, and community-generated plugins for their projects, making it easier to find help and support when needed.

  3. Routing: Beego uses a traditional routing system where routes are defined in a configuration file or directly in the code. Geddy, on the other hand, utilizes a more dynamic routing system that allows for route parameters and middleware, providing more flexibility and control over the routing process.

  4. Templating Engine: Beego uses the standard Go html/template package for rendering views, which may limit the flexibility and features available for templating. Geddy, on the other hand, uses the EJS (Embedded JavaScript) templating engine, providing a more powerful and feature-rich templating solution.

  5. ORM Support: Beego comes with built-in support for the ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) tool, providing an easy way to interact with databases. Geddy does not have built-in ORM support, requiring users to integrate third-party ORM libraries for database interactions.

  6. Middleware: Beego has a wide range of built-in middleware functions that can be easily integrated into applications for tasks like logging, authentication, and error handling. Geddy also supports middleware but may require more manual configuration and setup compared to Beego's built-in solutions.

In Summary, the key differences between Beego and Geddy lie in their architecture, community support, routing system, templating engine, ORM support, and middleware capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Geddy
Geddy
Beego
Beego

Geddy is a full stack open source MVC framework based on ruby on rails methodology with built-in authentication module, passportjs and socket.io integration.

It is a RESTful HTTP framework for the rapid development of Go applications including APIs, web apps and backend services with integrated Go specific features such as interfaces and struct embedding.

-
Interfaces; Struct embedding; Rapid Development
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.9K
GitHub Stars
744
GitHub Forks
234
GitHub Forks
183
Stacks
6
Stacks
52
Followers
23
Followers
98
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    MVC
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
Golang
Golang
Sentry
Sentry
Laravel
Laravel
Stream
Stream
Python
Python
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
KeyCDN
KeyCDN

What are some alternatives to Geddy, Beego?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase