Beanstalk vs Upsource

Overview

Beanstalk

Stacks85

Followers270

Votes51

Upsource

Stacks51

Followers77

Votes58

Beanstalk vs Upsource: What are the differences?

Deployment Process: One key difference between Beanstalk and Upsource is the focus on deployment. Beanstalk is primarily a deployment tool that facilitates the process of pushing code changes to a live server, ensuring a smooth deployment process. In contrast, Upsource is a code review tool that emphasizes code quality and collaboration among team members.
Version Control Integration: Beanstalk offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like Git and Subversion, allowing for easy code versioning and tracking. On the other hand, Upsource integrates with JetBrains' own version control system, TeamCity, providing a more unified development environment for users of JetBrains products.
Code Review Capabilities: While Beanstalk provides basic code review features, its primary focus remains on deployment and version control. In contrast, Upsource offers advanced code review capabilities, including inline commenting, code insights, and collaborative code reviews, making it a comprehensive code review tool for development teams.
Collaboration Tools: Upsource comes equipped with a range of collaboration tools, such as issue tracking, notifications, and project management capabilities, fostering better team collaboration and communication. Beanstalk, on the other hand, offers more limited collaboration features, focusing primarily on code deployment and version control.
Customization Options: Beanstalk provides a user-friendly interface with easy-to-use customization options for deployment processes and workflows, catering to users with varying levels of technical expertise. In comparison, Upsource offers more advanced customization options, allowing users to tailor the code review process to suit their specific requirements and workflows.
Cost Structure: Beanstalk follows a subscription-based pricing model, with different plans catering to the needs of freelancers, small teams, and larger organizations. On the other hand, Upsource offers a licensing model based on the number of users, making it a cost-effective option for teams of all sizes.

In Summary, Beanstalk and Upsource differ in their focus on deployment, version control integration, code review capabilities, collaboration tools, customization options, and cost structure, catering to the diverse needs of development teams.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Beanstalk	Upsource
A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.	Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.
Setup and manage repositories- Import or create Subversion and Git repositories that are instantly available to your team.;Invite team members, partners & clients- Restrict access to certain repos and provide read-only or full read/write permissions.;Browse files and changes- Every version of every file you’ve committed to Beanstalk is just a click away. See a timeline of who made changes and view the differences between revisions. Syntax highlighting for over 70 languages.;Preview, Compare & Share- Instantly preview HTML and image files in Beanstalk, compare versions side by side, and share them with your team, colleagues or clients, even if they don’t have a Beanstalk account.;Code Editing- Make and commit changes directly in the web interface of Beanstalk.;Blame Tool- View the line-by-line history of every file using Beanstalk's blame tool. Quickly see who was responsible for each line of code and which revision it belonged to.;Instantly deploy static assets from Beanstalk to your development, staging and production servers via Amazon S3, Rackspace Cloud Files, Heroku, DreamObjects;	Instantly access all your projects;Keep track of code changes;Use code insight in Java projects;Explore any revision of your code base;Discuss and review code;Share links to code
Statistics
Stacks 85	Stacks 51
Followers 270	Followers 77
Votes 51	Votes 58
Pros & Cons
Pros 14 Ftp deploy 9 Deployment 8 Easy to navigate 4 HipChat Integration 4 Code Editing	Pros 15 Free for 10 users 12 Good code review 8 Java code inspections and navigation 8 IDE integration 3 Has a linux version Cons 3 Very Large Server Footprint. Very large
Integrations
Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront Basecamp Campfire FogBugz Lighthouse Harvest Zendesk HipChat Bugify	GitHub Git Mercurial SVN (Subversion) Perforce

What are some alternatives to Beanstalk, Upsource?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

Related Comparisons

Beanstalk vs Upsource: What are the differences?

Deployment Process: One key difference between Beanstalk and Upsource is the focus on deployment. Beanstalk is primarily a deployment tool that facilitates the process of pushing code changes to a live server, ensuring a smooth deployment process. In contrast, Upsource is a code review tool that emphasizes code quality and collaboration among team members.
Version Control Integration: Beanstalk offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like Git and Subversion, allowing for easy code versioning and tracking. On the other hand, Upsource integrates with JetBrains' own version control system, TeamCity, providing a more unified development environment for users of JetBrains products.
Code Review Capabilities: While Beanstalk provides basic code review features, its primary focus remains on deployment and version control. In contrast, Upsource offers advanced code review capabilities, including inline commenting, code insights, and collaborative code reviews, making it a comprehensive code review tool for development teams.
Collaboration Tools: Upsource comes equipped with a range of collaboration tools, such as issue tracking, notifications, and project management capabilities, fostering better team collaboration and communication. Beanstalk, on the other hand, offers more limited collaboration features, focusing primarily on code deployment and version control.
Customization Options: Beanstalk provides a user-friendly interface with easy-to-use customization options for deployment processes and workflows, catering to users with varying levels of technical expertise. In comparison, Upsource offers more advanced customization options, allowing users to tailor the code review process to suit their specific requirements and workflows.
Cost Structure: Beanstalk follows a subscription-based pricing model, with different plans catering to the needs of freelancers, small teams, and larger organizations. On the other hand, Upsource offers a licensing model based on the number of users, making it a cost-effective option for teams of all sizes.

Beanstalk vs Upsource

Overview