Azure Repos vs Bitbucket

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Azure Repos

Stacks64

Followers92

Votes0

Azure Repos vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

As organizations continue to leverage version control systems for software development, distinguishing between Azure Repos and Bitbucket becomes crucial. Below are the key differences between Azure Repos and Bitbucket that can aid in decision-making processes.

Hosting Type: Azure Repos is solely cloud-based and part of Microsoft Azure's suite of services, while Bitbucket offers both cloud-based and self-hosted options, providing more flexibility for teams with specific hosting requirements.
Pricing Structure: Azure Repos is bundled as part of Azure DevOps Services, with pricing based on the usage of the entire DevOps platform. In contrast, Bitbucket offers a tiered pricing structure based on the number of users, making it a more cost-effective solution for smaller teams.
Integration Capabilities: Azure Repos seamlessly integrates with other Azure services such as Azure Boards for project management and Azure Pipelines for CI/CD processes, offering a comprehensive DevOps solution. Bitbucket, on the other hand, integrates well with other Atlassian products like Jira and Bamboo, catering to teams using the Atlassian ecosystem.
Built-in Code Search: Bitbucket provides built-in code search functionality, allowing developers to quickly find and navigate code within repositories. While Azure Repos lacks this feature natively, it can be supplemented using Azure Search for code search capabilities.
Support for Large Files: Bitbucket excels in handling large files and repositories due to its LFS (Large File Storage) support, making it ideal for projects with extensive media or binary files. Azure Repos, on the other hand, may encounter limitations with large files due to the default file size constraints in Azure DevOps.

In Summary, Azure Repos offers deep integration with Azure services and a cloud-exclusive hosting model, while Bitbucket provides flexibility in hosting options, robust code search capabilities, and better support for large files.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Azure Repos

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Azure Repos
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	It is a set of version control tools that you can use to manage your code. Get unlimited private Git repository hosting and support across all scales, from a single hobby project for TFVC to the world's largest repository.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Free private Git repositories, pull requests and code search; Support for all Git clients; Web hooks and API integration; Semantic code search
Statistics
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 64
Followers 33.4K	Followers 92
Votes 2.8K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	Azure Pipelines Git

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Azure Repos?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

Azure Repos vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

Hosting Type: Azure Repos is solely cloud-based and part of Microsoft Azure's suite of services, while Bitbucket offers both cloud-based and self-hosted options, providing more flexibility for teams with specific hosting requirements.
Pricing Structure: Azure Repos is bundled as part of Azure DevOps Services, with pricing based on the usage of the entire DevOps platform. In contrast, Bitbucket offers a tiered pricing structure based on the number of users, making it a more cost-effective solution for smaller teams.
Integration Capabilities: Azure Repos seamlessly integrates with other Azure services such as Azure Boards for project management and Azure Pipelines for CI/CD processes, offering a comprehensive DevOps solution. Bitbucket, on the other hand, integrates well with other Atlassian products like Jira and Bamboo, catering to teams using the Atlassian ecosystem.
Built-in Code Search: Bitbucket provides built-in code search functionality, allowing developers to quickly find and navigate code within repositories. While Azure Repos lacks this feature natively, it can be supplemented using Azure Search for code search capabilities.
Support for Large Files: Bitbucket excels in handling large files and repositories due to its LFS (Large File Storage) support, making it ideal for projects with extensive media or binary files. Azure Repos, on the other hand, may encounter limitations with large files due to the default file size constraints in Azure DevOps.

Azure Repos vs Bitbucket

Overview