StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. In-Memory Databases
  4. In Memory Databases
  5. Azure Redis Cache vs SAP HANA

Azure Redis Cache vs SAP HANA

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SAP HANA
SAP HANA
Stacks169
Followers148
Votes27
Azure Redis Cache
Azure Redis Cache
Stacks58
Followers124
Votes7

Azure Redis Cache vs SAP HANA: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Azure Redis Cache and SAP HANA, it is essential to understand key differences to determine which would be more suitable for a specific use case.

  1. Technology Focus: Azure Redis Cache is an in-memory data store based on open-source Redis. It is ideal for caching and session management in applications to improve performance. On the other hand, SAP HANA is an in-memory data platform designed for high-performance analytics and transaction processing. It can handle complex queries and real-time data processing efficiently.

  2. Scalability: Azure Redis Cache offers horizontal scalability through its clustering feature, allowing users to scale out by adding more cache nodes. SAP HANA, while also scalable, requires more planning and resources for scaling due to its complex architecture and the need for additional hardware.

  3. Data Persistence: Azure Redis Cache primarily focuses on performance and caching data in memory. It does offer options for data persistence through snapshot-based backups. In contrast, SAP HANA is designed with built-in data persistence capabilities, ensuring data reliability and durability even in case of system failures.

  4. Use Cases: Azure Redis Cache is commonly used for improving application performance through caching frequently accessed data and session management. On the other hand, SAP HANA is often used for real-time analytics, complex query processing, and handling large volumes of data in various industries such as finance and healthcare.

  5. Cost Structure: Azure Redis Cache follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on cache size and features used. SAP HANA, being a comprehensive in-memory data platform, typically has a higher initial investment due to licensing costs, hardware requirements, and ongoing maintenance expenses.

  6. Vendor Support: Azure Redis Cache is a service provided by Microsoft through the Azure platform, offering comprehensive support and integration with other Azure services. SAP HANA, on the other hand, is a product of SAP, known for its robust technical support and extensive community resources for users to leverage.

In Summary, Azure Redis Cache and SAP HANA cater to different requirements, with Azure Redis Cache being more focused on caching and performance optimization, while SAP HANA excels in high-performance analytics and data processing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SAP HANA
SAP HANA
Azure Redis Cache
Azure Redis Cache

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

It perfectly complements Azure database services such as Cosmos DB. It provides a cost-effective solution to scale read and write throughput of your data tier. Store and share database query results, session states, static contents, and more using a common cache-aside pattern.

processes transactions and analytics at the same time; built-in advanced analytics and multi-model data processing engines
Enterprise-grade security; Flexible scaling; Improve application throughput and latency; Speed up applications with a distributed cache
Statistics
Stacks
169
Stacks
58
Followers
148
Followers
124
Votes
27
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    SQL
  • 5
    In-memory
  • 4
    Performance
  • 4
    Distributed
  • 2
    Realtime
Pros
  • 4
    Cache-cluster
  • 3
    Redis
Integrations
Python
Python
Power BI
Power BI
Tableau
Tableau
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to SAP HANA, Azure Redis Cache?

Redis

Redis

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

VoltDB

VoltDB

VoltDB is a fundamental redesign of the RDBMS that provides unparalleled performance and scalability on bare-metal, virtualized and cloud infrastructures. VoltDB is a modern in-memory architecture that supports both SQL + Java with data durability and fault tolerance.

Tarantool

Tarantool

It is designed to give you the flexibility, scalability, and performance that you want, as well as the reliability and manageability that you need in mission-critical applications

KeyDB

KeyDB

KeyDB is a fully open source database that aims to make use of all hardware resources. KeyDB makes it possible to breach boundaries often dictated by price and complexity.

LokiJS

LokiJS

LokiJS is a document oriented database written in javascript, published under MIT License. Its purpose is to store javascript objects as documents in a nosql fashion and retrieve them with a similar mechanism. Runs in node (including cordova/phonegap and node-webkit), nativescript and the browser.

BuntDB

BuntDB

BuntDB is a low-level, in-memory, key/value store in pure Go. It persists to disk, is ACID compliant, and uses locking for multiple readers and a single writer. It supports custom indexes and geospatial data. It's ideal for projects that need a dependable database and favor speed over data size.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase