StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Azure Functions vs Memcached

Azure Functions vs Memcached

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Memcached
Memcached
Stacks7.9K
Followers5.7K
Votes473
GitHub Stars14.0K
Forks3.3K
Azure Functions
Azure Functions
Stacks785
Followers705
Votes62

Azure Functions vs Memcached: What are the differences?

Azure Functions vs Memcached

Azure Functions and Memcached are both widely used in cloud computing, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features.

1. **Functionality**: Azure Functions are event-driven serverless compute services that allow developers to run small pieces of code in response to events or triggers. On the other hand, Memcached is an in-memory key-value store that is used for caching data to improve the performance of web applications.

2. **Deployment**: Azure Functions are deployed and managed within the Azure cloud platform, providing easy scalability and efficiency. Memcached, on the other hand, needs to be deployed on servers or containers maintained by the user, requiring more upfront setup and management efforts.

3. **Data Storage**: Azure Functions do not provide persistent storage by default, as they are designed to be stateless and ephemeral. In contrast, Memcached stores data in-memory, offering fast access times but limited by the available memory resources.

4. **Cost Structure**: Azure Functions are priced based on the number of executions and resource consumption, allowing for cost-efficient use of serverless computing. Memcached, on the other hand, may involve additional costs for maintaining servers or containers and scaling memory resources as the data grows.

5. **Scalability**: Azure Functions can automatically scale based on demand without any user intervention, making them highly scalable and cost-effective. Memcached scalability relies on manual configuration and optimization to support increasing workloads and data storage requirements. 

6. **Use Cases**: Azure Functions are ideal for processing data streams, background tasks, and event-driven applications, while Memcached is best suited for caching frequently accessed data, session management, and improving database performance through caching.

In Summary, Azure Functions and Memcached serve different purposes, with Azure Functions focusing on event-driven serverless compute and Memcached on in-memory data caching for improved application performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Memcached
Memcached
Azure Functions
Azure Functions

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

-
Easily schedule event-driven tasks across services;Expose Functions as HTTP API endpoints;Scale Functions based on customer demand;Develop how you want, using a browser-based UI or existing tools;Get continuous deployment, remote debugging, and authentication out of the box
Statistics
GitHub Stars
14.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
7.9K
Stacks
785
Followers
5.7K
Followers
705
Votes
473
Votes
62
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 139
    Fast object cache
  • 129
    High-performance
  • 91
    Stable
  • 65
    Mature
  • 33
    Distributed caching system
Cons
  • 2
    Only caches simple types
Pros
  • 14
    Pay only when invoked
  • 11
    Great developer experience for C#
  • 9
    Multiple languages supported
  • 7
    Great debugging support
  • 5
    Can be used as lightweight https service
Cons
  • 1
    Sporadic server & language runtime issues
  • 1
    Not suited for long-running applications
  • 1
    No persistent (writable) file system available
  • 1
    Poor support for Linux environments
Integrations
No integrations available
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Java
Java
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Node.js
Node.js
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
GitHub
GitHub
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
JavaScript
JavaScript
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
C#
C#

What are some alternatives to Memcached, Azure Functions?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase