Azure Cosmos DB vs GrapheneDB

Overview

GrapheneDB

Stacks14

Followers27

Votes0

Azure Cosmos DB

Stacks594

Followers1.1K

Votes130

Azure Cosmos DB vs GrapheneDB: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Azure Cosmos DB and GrapheneDB are both widely used NoSQL databases known for their scalability and high performance. Each platform has its own unique features and strengths that cater to different use cases.

1. **Data Model**: Azure Cosmos DB is a multi-model database that supports document, key-value, graph, and column-family data models, providing versatility in data types. On the other hand, GrapheneDB specifically focuses on graph databases, offering optimized support for graph data structures such as nodes, edges, and properties.
   
2. **Scalability**: Azure Cosmos DB offers global distribution with multiple consistency options, automatic scaling, and guaranteed low latency, making it suitable for globally distributed applications. In contrast, GrapheneDB is more focused on providing high availability and performance for graph workloads, specializing in graph-specific querying and traversals.

3. **Query Language**: Azure Cosmos DB uses SQL API, MongoDB API, Gremlin API, and others depending on the data model being used, providing versatility in querying approaches. GrapheneDB, being a graph database, utilizes query languages like Cypher and SPARQL optimized for graph traversal and pattern matching.

4. **Operational Management**: Azure Cosmos DB is a fully managed database service by Microsoft, handling automatic provisioning, scaling, and monitoring of the database, reducing operational overhead for users. GrapheneDB, while also offering managed services, specifically focuses on graph database management, providing optimized configurations for graph data storage and querying.

5. **Cost Structure**: Azure Cosmos DB offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model with options for reserved capacity, enabling cost optimization based on usage patterns. GrapheneDB typically operates on a subscription-based pricing structure, catering to specific graph database needs with variations in pricing based on the chosen configuration.

6. **Ecosystem Integration**: Azure Cosmos DB integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft Azure services and tools, enabling easy integration with the broader Azure ecosystem, making it convenient for users already using Azure services. GrapheneDB focuses on providing a specialized graph database solution and may offer more limited integrations compared to Azure Cosmos DB.

In Summary, Azure Cosmos DB and GrapheneDB differ in their data models, scalability options, query languages, operational management, cost structures, and ecosystem integrations, catering to diverse requirements in the NoSQL database space.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

GrapheneDB	Azure Cosmos DB
With automated backups, lightning-fast provisioning, 24x7 monitoring, and best-in-class support. Available on AWS, Azure and Heroku.	Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.
Cloud scaling;Available in all major providers;24x7 monitoring;Expert support;Backups;Dashboard;Extensible;Pay as you go;Team collaboration	Fully managed with 99.99% Availability SLA;Elastically and highly scalable (both throughput and storage);Predictable low latency: <10ms @ P99 reads and <15ms @ P99 fully-indexed writes;Globally distributed with multi-region replication;Rich SQL queries over schema-agnostic automatic indexing;JavaScript language integrated multi-record ACID transactions with snapshot isolation;Well-defined tunable consistency models: Strong, Bounded Staleness, Session, and Eventual
Statistics
Stacks 14	Stacks 594
Followers 27	Followers 1.1K
Votes 0	Votes 130
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 28 Best-of-breed NoSQL features 22 High scalability 15 Globally distributed 14 Automatic indexing over flexible json data model 10 Tunable consistency Cons 18 Pricing 4 Poor No SQL query support
Integrations
Neo4j Microsoft Azure Heroku	Azure Machine Learning MongoDB Hadoop Java Azure Functions Azure Container Service Azure Storage Azure Websites Apache Spark Python

What are some alternatives to GrapheneDB, Azure Cosmos DB?

Amazon DynamoDB

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.

Cloudant

Cloudant’s distributed database as a service (DBaaS) allows developers of fast-growing web and mobile apps to focus on building and improving their products, instead of worrying about scaling and managing databases on their own.

Google Cloud Bigtable

Google Cloud Bigtable offers you a fast, fully managed, massively scalable NoSQL database service that's ideal for web, mobile, and Internet of Things applications requiring terabytes to petabytes of data. Unlike comparable market offerings, Cloud Bigtable doesn't require you to sacrifice speed, scale, or cost efficiency when your applications grow. Cloud Bigtable has been battle-tested at Google for more than 10 years—it's the database driving major applications such as Google Analytics and Gmail.

Graph Story

Graph Story offers fully-managed, fast, secure and affordable access to graph databases-as-a-service and makes them even easier to use through our customized API.

Amazon Neptune

Amazon Neptune is a fast, reliable, fully-managed graph database service that makes it easy to build and run applications that work with highly connected datasets. The core of Amazon Neptune is a purpose-built, high-performance graph database engine optimized for storing billions of relationships and querying the graph with milliseconds latency.

Google Cloud Datastore

Use a managed, NoSQL, schemaless database for storing non-relational data. Cloud Datastore automatically scales as you need it and supports transactions as well as robust, SQL-like queries.

CloudBoost

CloudBoost.io is a database service for the “next web” - that not only does data-storage, but also search, real-time and a whole lot more which enables developers to build much richer apps with 50% less time saving them a ton of cost and helping them go to market much faster.

Firebase Realtime Database

It is a cloud-hosted NoSQL database that lets you store and sync data between your users in realtime. Data is synced across all clients in realtime, and remains available when your app goes offline.

restdb.io

RestDB is a NoSql document oriented database cloud service. Data is accessed as JSON objects via HTTPS. This gives great flexibility, easy system integration and future compatibility.

Related Comparisons

Azure Cosmos DB vs GrapheneDB: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Azure Cosmos DB and GrapheneDB are both widely used NoSQL databases known for their scalability and high performance. Each platform has its own unique features and strengths that cater to different use cases.

1. **Data Model**: Azure Cosmos DB is a multi-model database that supports document, key-value, graph, and column-family data models, providing versatility in data types. On the other hand, GrapheneDB specifically focuses on graph databases, offering optimized support for graph data structures such as nodes, edges, and properties.
   
2. **Scalability**: Azure Cosmos DB offers global distribution with multiple consistency options, automatic scaling, and guaranteed low latency, making it suitable for globally distributed applications. In contrast, GrapheneDB is more focused on providing high availability and performance for graph workloads, specializing in graph-specific querying and traversals.

3. **Query Language**: Azure Cosmos DB uses SQL API, MongoDB API, Gremlin API, and others depending on the data model being used, providing versatility in querying approaches. GrapheneDB, being a graph database, utilizes query languages like Cypher and SPARQL optimized for graph traversal and pattern matching.

4. **Operational Management**: Azure Cosmos DB is a fully managed database service by Microsoft, handling automatic provisioning, scaling, and monitoring of the database, reducing operational overhead for users. GrapheneDB, while also offering managed services, specifically focuses on graph database management, providing optimized configurations for graph data storage and querying.

5. **Cost Structure**: Azure Cosmos DB offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model with options for reserved capacity, enabling cost optimization based on usage patterns. GrapheneDB typically operates on a subscription-based pricing structure, catering to specific graph database needs with variations in pricing based on the chosen configuration.

6. **Ecosystem Integration**: Azure Cosmos DB integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft Azure services and tools, enabling easy integration with the broader Azure ecosystem, making it convenient for users already using Azure services. GrapheneDB focuses on providing a specialized graph database solution and may offer more limited integrations compared to Azure Cosmos DB.

Azure Cosmos DB vs GrapheneDB

Overview