StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Service Discovery
  5. Azure Container Service vs Zookeeper

Azure Container Service vs Zookeeper

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zookeeper
Zookeeper
Stacks889
Followers1.0K
Votes43
Azure Container Service
Azure Container Service
Stacks97
Followers214
Votes11

Azure Container Service vs Zookeeper: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Container Service and Zookeeper are both technologies used for managing distributed systems, but they have key differences that set them apart. Here are six specific differences between Azure Container Service and Zookeeper.

  1. Architecture: Azure Container Service is a managed container orchestration service provided by Microsoft Azure. It enables the deployment and management of containerized applications using popular orchestration systems like Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, and DC/OS. On the other hand, Zookeeper is a distributed coordination service that provides a centralized and reliable way to manage and synchronize distributed systems.

  2. Functionality: Azure Container Service is primarily focused on providing a platform for deploying and managing containerized applications. It offers features like automatic scaling, load balancing, and easy integration with other Azure services. In contrast, Zookeeper is designed specifically for distributed coordination and synchronization tasks. It provides functionalities like distributed configuration management, leader election, and consensus algorithms.

  3. Scalability: Azure Container Service is built to scale efficiently. It can handle a large number of containers and automatically scale resources based on demand. Zookeeper, on the other hand, can handle small to medium-sized distributed systems effectively, but it may face challenges when dealing with highly scalable systems as it relies on a centralized architecture for coordination.

  4. Ease of Use: Azure Container Service provides a user-friendly interface and offers integration with Azure's management tools, making it easy to manage containerized applications. It also has built-in support for various orchestration systems, simplifying the deployment process. Zookeeper, while powerful, requires more manual configuration and management, which can be more complex for users without distributed systems expertise.

  5. Compatibility: Azure Container Service works seamlessly with other Azure services, allowing for seamless integration and access to additional functionalities. It also supports multiple orchestration systems, giving users flexibility in choosing the best fit for their needs. Zookeeper, on the other hand, is technology-agnostic and can be used with various programming languages and frameworks, making it more versatile for different types of distributed systems.

  6. Community and Support: Azure Container Service benefits from the extensive support and community of Microsoft Azure, a major cloud service provider. Users can access documentation, tutorials, and community forums to get help and support. On the other hand, Zookeeper has a dedicated community and support channels, with a focus on distributed systems, allowing users to get specific help and advice for their coordination needs.

In summary, Azure Container Service is a managed container orchestration service with a focus on deploying and managing containerized applications, while Zookeeper is a distributed coordination service that provides functionalities for managing and synchronizing distributed systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Zookeeper
Zookeeper
Azure Container Service
Azure Container Service

A centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. All of these kinds of services are used in some form or another by distributed applications.

Azure Container Service optimizes the configuration of popular open source tools and technologies specifically for Azure. You get an open solution that offers portability for both your containers and your application configuration. You select the size, the number of hosts, and choice of orchestrator tools, and Container Service handles everything else.

-
Create a container hosting solution optimized for Azure;Scale and orchestrate applications using Apache Mesos or Docker Swarm;Use popular open source, client-side tooling;Migrate container workloads to and from Azure without code changes
Statistics
Stacks
889
Stacks
97
Followers
1.0K
Followers
214
Votes
43
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    High performance ,easy to generate node specific config
  • 8
    Java
  • 8
    Kafka support
  • 5
    Spring Boot Support
  • 3
    Supports extensive distributed IPC
Pros
  • 6
    Easy to setup, very agnostic
  • 3
    It supports Kubernetes, Mesos DC/OS and Docker Swarm
  • 2
    It has a nice command line interface (CLI) tool
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker
Docker
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos

What are some alternatives to Zookeeper, Azure Container Service?

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

Consul

Consul

Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.

Google Kubernetes Engine

Google Kubernetes Engine

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

Eureka

Eureka

Eureka is a REST (Representational State Transfer) based service that is primarily used in the AWS cloud for locating services for the purpose of load balancing and failover of middle-tier servers.

Containerum

Containerum

Containerum is built to aid cluster management, teamwork and resource allocation. Containerum runs on top of any Kubernetes cluster and provides a friendly Web UI for cluster management.

etcd

etcd

etcd is a distributed key value store that provides a reliable way to store data across a cluster of machines. It’s open-source and available on GitHub. etcd gracefully handles master elections during network partitions and will tolerate machine failure, including the master.

Docker Cloud

Docker Cloud

Docker Cloud is the best way to deploy and manage Dockerized applications. Docker Cloud makes it easy for new Docker users to manage and deploy the full spectrum of applications, from single container apps to distributed microservices stacks, to any cloud or on-premises infrastructure.

Keepalived

Keepalived

The main goal of this project is to provide simple and robust facilities for loadbalancing and high-availability to Linux system and Linux based infrastructures.

Amazon EKS

Amazon EKS

Amazon Elastic Container Service for Kubernetes (Amazon EKS) is a managed service that makes it easy for you to run Kubernetes on AWS without needing to install and operate your own Kubernetes clusters.

SkyDNS

SkyDNS

SkyDNS is a distributed service for announcement and discovery of services. It leverages Raft for high-availability and consensus, and utilizes DNS queries to discover available services. This is done by leveraging SRV records in DNS, with special meaning given to subdomains, priorities and weights (more info here: http://blog.gopheracademy.com/skydns).

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana