Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Axcept

1
1
+ 1
0
WebdriverIO

349
507
+ 1
40
Add tool

WebdriverIO vs Axcept: What are the differences?

What is WebdriverIO? Webdriver/Selenium 2.0 JavaScript bindings for Node.js. WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

What is Axcept? A simple and intuitive way to build and execute UI tests. It helps you to spot every bug by visually comparing screenshots. No matter if it's an unwanted UI change or a broken feature.

WebdriverIO and Axcept can be primarily classified as "Browser Testing" tools.

Some of the features offered by WebdriverIO are:

  • Extendable
  • Support for the WebDriver specification as well as to Appium
  • Easy Test Setup

On the other hand, Axcept provides the following key features:

  • Automated UI testing
  • Simple
  • No coding or programming required

WebdriverIO is an open source tool with 5.58K GitHub stars and 1.63K GitHub forks. Here's a link to WebdriverIO's open source repository on GitHub.

Advice on Axcept and WebdriverIO
Needs advice
on
JestJestSeleniumSelenium
and
WebdriverIOWebdriverIO
in

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

See more
Replies (1)
Prashanth Marappa
Senior Software Engineer at Mphasis · | 1 upvotes · 234.6K views
Recommends
on
SeleniumSelenium

with the help of selenium we can automate react js for functional testing

See more
Needs advice
on
CypressCypressSelenideSelenide
and
WebdriverIOWebdriverIO

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

See more
Replies (3)
Recommends
on
PlaywrightPlaywright

You should also definitely look into Playwright, which is a new automation tool from Microsoft building on top of the Puppeteer experience and trying to bring this experience in the cross browser space - very exciting project. Great team. Also CodeceptJS as already Playwright support which at a ton of valuable features on top of Playwright, give it a go!

See more
Jinesh Khimsaria
Test Automation Specialist at Personal · | 3 upvotes · 78.4K views
Recommends
on
WebdriverIOWebdriverIO

I'm also looking for the same, FE: React & BE: NodeJS. Cypress won't help as it lacks cross-browser testing, it doesn't support all the browsers. I'm still investigating it, but looks like WebdriverIO may fulfil what I'm looking for - Cross-browser testing, integration with CI/CD, running it as a docker service, good support on assertions & reporting of test results. Let me know if you found any information on any of the above mentioned points.

See more
Recommends
on
CodeceptJSCodeceptJS

Hi Esther, if you really need cross OS and cross device automation Cypress wont help, with WebdriverIO you can do it … and check out CodeceptJS, which is a wrapper around several frameworks (like WebdriverIO) and will support future players (currently for example upcoming Playwright) as well.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Axcept
Pros of WebdriverIO
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 11
      Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs
    • 10
      Open Source
    • 8
      Great community
    • 7
      Easy to setup
    • 4
      Best solution for broad browser support

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Axcept
    Cons of WebdriverIO
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 8
        High maintenance

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Axcept?

      It helps you to spot every bug by visually comparing screenshots. No matter if it's an unwanted UI change or a broken feature.

      What is WebdriverIO?

      WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Axcept?
      What companies use WebdriverIO?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Axcept?
      What tools integrate with WebdriverIO?
        No integrations found

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to Axcept and WebdriverIO?
        Git
        Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
        GitHub
        GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
        Visual Studio Code
        Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.
        Docker
        The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
        npm
        npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.
        See all alternatives