AWS Storage Gateway vs Sandbox

Overview

AWS Storage Gateway

Stacks17

Followers59

Votes0

Sandbox

Stacks28

Followers55

Votes0

GitHub Stars6

Forks5

AWS Storage Gateway vs Sandbox: What are the differences?

Storage Integration: AWS Storage Gateway facilitates seamless integration with AWS storage services like S3, Glacier, and EBS, enabling businesses to extend their on-premises storage solutions to the cloud effortlessly. On the other hand, Sandbox offers storage solutions that are more focused on local storage with limited cloud integration capabilities.
Protocols Supported: AWS Storage Gateway supports a wide range of storage interfaces, including NFS, iSCSI, and SMB. This versatility allows for greater flexibility in connecting with different applications and workloads. In contrast, Sandbox may have a more limited range of supported protocols, potentially restricting compatibility with certain systems.
Scalability and Flexibility: AWS Storage Gateway offers scalable storage solutions that can adapt to changing business needs, allowing for easy expansion as requirements grow. In comparison, Sandbox may have limitations in terms of scalability and flexibility, which could impact long-term storage management strategies for growing organizations.
Data Transfer Speeds: AWS Storage Gateway leverages AWS's global infrastructure to provide high-speed data transfer capabilities, ensuring efficient and reliable data transmission between on-premises environments and the cloud. Sandbox, while offering its own storage solutions, may not have the same level of optimized data transfer speeds as AWS Storage Gateway.
Management and Monitoring Tools: AWS Storage Gateway comes with a comprehensive set of management and monitoring tools that offer insights into storage usage, performance metrics, and data transfer activity. In contrast, Sandbox may provide more basic management and monitoring features, which could limit visibility and control over storage resources.
Cost Structure: AWS Storage Gateway follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing businesses to scale storage usage based on actual needs and only pay for what is used. Sandbox, depending on the provider, may have different pricing structures that could impact the overall cost of storage solutions over time.

In Summary, when comparing AWS Storage Gateway and Sandbox, the key differences lie in storage integration, supported protocols, scalability, data transfer speeds, management tools, and cost structures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS Storage Gateway	Sandbox
The AWS Storage Gateway is a service connecting an on-premises software appliance with cloud-based storage. Once the AWS Storage Gateway’s software appliance is installed on a local host, you can mount Storage Gateway volumes to your on-premises application servers as iSCSI devices, enabling a wide variety of systems and applications to make use of them. Data written to these volumes is maintained on your on-premises storage hardware while being asynchronously backed up to AWS, where it is stored in Amazon Glacier or in Amazon S3 in the form of Amazon EBS snapshots. Snapshots are encrypted to make sure that customers do not have to worry about encrypting sensitive data themselves. When customers need to retrieve data, they can restore snapshots locally, or create Amazon EBS volumes from snapshots for use with applications running in Amazon EC2. It provides low-latency performance by maintaining frequently accessed data on-premises while securely storing all of your data encrypted.	Quickly mock RESTful API or SOAP web-services with simple or dynamic responses, and fault injection to simulate real application behaviour.
Gateway-Cached Volumes – Gateway-Cached volumes allow you to utilize Amazon S3 for your primary data, while retaining some portion of it locally in a cache for frequently accessed data.;Gateway-Stored Volumes – Gateway-Stored volumes store your primary data locally, while asynchronously backing up that data to AWS.;Data Snapshots – Gateway-Cached volumes and Gateway-Stored volumes provide the ability to create and store point-in-time snapshots of your storage volumes in Amazon S3.;Gateway-VTL – Gateway-VTL provides you with a cost-effective, scalable, and durable virtual tape infrastructure that allows you to eliminate the challenges associated with owning and operating an on-premises physical tape infrastructure.;Secure – The AWS Storage Gateway securely transfers your data to AWS over SSL and stores data encrypted at rest in Amazon S3 and Amazon Glacier using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) 256, a secure symmetric-key encryption standard using 256-bit encryption keys.;Durably backed by Amazon S3 and Amazon Glacier –The AWS Storage Gateway durably stores your on-premises application data by uploading it to Amazon S3 and Amazon Glacier. Amazon S3 and Amazon Glacier redundantly store data in multiple facilities and on multiple devices within each facility. Amazon S3 and Amazon Glacier also perform regular, systematic data integrity checks and are built to be automatically self-healing.;Compatible – There is no need to re-architect your on-premises applications. Gateway-Cached volumes and Gateway-Stored volumes expose a standard iSCSI block disk device interface and Gateway-VTL presents a standard iSCSI virtual tape library interface.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 6
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 5
Stacks 17	Stacks 28
Followers 59	Followers 55
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Apiary Swagger UI RAML

What are some alternatives to AWS Storage Gateway, Sandbox?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

AWS Storage Gateway vs Sandbox: What are the differences?

Storage Integration: AWS Storage Gateway facilitates seamless integration with AWS storage services like S3, Glacier, and EBS, enabling businesses to extend their on-premises storage solutions to the cloud effortlessly. On the other hand, Sandbox offers storage solutions that are more focused on local storage with limited cloud integration capabilities.
Protocols Supported: AWS Storage Gateway supports a wide range of storage interfaces, including NFS, iSCSI, and SMB. This versatility allows for greater flexibility in connecting with different applications and workloads. In contrast, Sandbox may have a more limited range of supported protocols, potentially restricting compatibility with certain systems.
Scalability and Flexibility: AWS Storage Gateway offers scalable storage solutions that can adapt to changing business needs, allowing for easy expansion as requirements grow. In comparison, Sandbox may have limitations in terms of scalability and flexibility, which could impact long-term storage management strategies for growing organizations.
Data Transfer Speeds: AWS Storage Gateway leverages AWS's global infrastructure to provide high-speed data transfer capabilities, ensuring efficient and reliable data transmission between on-premises environments and the cloud. Sandbox, while offering its own storage solutions, may not have the same level of optimized data transfer speeds as AWS Storage Gateway.
Management and Monitoring Tools: AWS Storage Gateway comes with a comprehensive set of management and monitoring tools that offer insights into storage usage, performance metrics, and data transfer activity. In contrast, Sandbox may provide more basic management and monitoring features, which could limit visibility and control over storage resources.
Cost Structure: AWS Storage Gateway follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing businesses to scale storage usage based on actual needs and only pay for what is used. Sandbox, depending on the provider, may have different pricing structures that could impact the overall cost of storage solutions over time.

AWS Storage Gateway vs Sandbox

Overview